Welfare Infringing And Diminishing Human Rights Social Work Essay

Uusitalo ( 1985 ) asserted that a normally discussed point about province public assistance is its ability to redistribute wealth. However, there are other observers who do non hold with this averment and experience that State Welfare ( SW ) has failed to redistribute wealth and create equality ( Miller, 1994 ; Clegg, 2010 ; Osborne 2010 ; Grice, 2009 ) . SW was instituted to, in a manner, give basic human rights such as the right to education, wellness, societal services, lodging and societal security. It was hence imperative that all persons had entree to it and were treated every bit by the system.

Thane ( 2010 ) asserts that although UK is perceived to be an accommodative society, unfairness and bias has long existed in the state. Legislative Acts such as the Discrimination Act 1995, Equality Act 2010 and the UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities lawfully give handicapped people civil rights, yet handicapped people remain at a disadvantage. Massie ( 2007 ) claims that handicapped people of working age are still populating below the comparative poorness degree. This is affirmed by handicapped militants such as Mike Oliver, Colin Barnes and others ( Barnes, 1981 ; Oliver and Barnes 1991 ) . It is alleged that SW has non merely failed to guarantee handicapped people ‘s basic human rights but it has besides infringed and diminished some of these rights.

This essay will analyze the averment, foremost by specifying what State Welfare ( SW ) is. Second, it will briefly discourse the theory and history of SW in the United Kingdom and critically analyze how SW has enabled handicapped people to exert their rights, particularly in recent times, through Independent Living, Direct Payments and Basic Income. Third, it will analyze the Human Rights Act 1998 and the UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the visible radiation of Human Rights rules. Fourth, it will research how SW has infringed on the rights of persons comparative to instruction, lodging, employment, wellness and societal security. Last but in no means the least ; it will foreground the function of professionals in perpetuating dependence, and discourse the function of the Disabled People ‘s motion in disputing SW proviso and developing alternate policies and services to take disenabling barriers. It will reason by pulling the statements together relative to the inquiry.

Definition of Welfare

Academicians, historiographers and societal observers have all attempted to specify State Welfare ( SW ) . Lowe ( 1993 ) nevertheless, purports that there is no formal definition of the term State Welfare. Wedderburn ( 1965 ) defines SW as a authorities duty of some degree which alters demand and supply to guarantee just income distribution. Lowe ( 2005 ) has besides defined SW as non merely a instance of supplying an stray human service but a community where the province embraces answerability for the wellbeing of everybody. The Cambridge lexicon ( 2011 ) has described it as a signifier of revenue enhancement aggregation that allows the province to supply basic human rights such as wellness, societal security etcetera to those who require it.

Briggs ( 1961 ) contextualizes SW by reasoning that the province uses its ‘ sovereignty to pull strings demand and supply for labor in three ways. The first is to do certain people receive a basic income regardless of the monetary value of their labor or sum of their assets. The 2nd is to understate uncertainness by run intoing people ‘s basic needs to relieve societal want and the 3rd is to give people entree to good quality services irrespective of their societal standing. While Marshall ( 1950 ) purports that public assistance rights and societal citizenship are closely connected, rendering SW worthless without public assistance rights. Esping-Anderson ( 1990 ) besides points out that societal citizenship is made up of the indispensable impression of SW.

Theories of State Welfare

State Welfare ( SW ) does non be on its ‘ ain, like any other system it is underpinned by assorted theories. O’Brien and Penna ( 1998 ) explain that theories are non rational constructs taken out of this universe but thoughts which give counsel and explains behavior. SW in United Kingdom ( UK ) is underpinned by four chief theories and they are as follow:


Liberalism takes the position that persons should back up themselves with the province interfering merely when they are non able to make so. Gray ( 1989 ) , a advocate of pluralist liberalism, maintains that there are different sorts of progressives. First, there are those who take individuality to the extreme and rely on themselves entirely, with the province step ining merely when it comes to their freedom. Second, there are those who although are dedicated to their freedom, do non mind communal programs for socio-political patterned advance. Finally, there are those who besides see any province intervention as immorality. Liberals are said to hold created the rudimentss of SW ( Clegg, 2011 ) .


Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote their work during the nineteenth Century. Marxism concerns itself with philistinism. Marx and Engels argued that the hostility among societal categories lead to societal alteration, which eventually culminates into capitalist economy: the common ‘evil ‘ predominant in today ‘s socio-economic constructions. They see capitalist economy as ‘evil ‘ because they hold the sentiment that it promotes subjugation where the on the job category are exploited by the opinion category – middle class ( Avineri, 1968 pg 3 ) . The tradition of Marxism does non advance the position of SW as basically the Marxist does non see public assistance as the manner frontward for altering inequalities. ( Esping-Anderson, 1998 ) .


Neo-liberalism is an political orientation that sustains an ethical and rational base for capitalist economy. It associates itself with economic sciences, societal behavior and societal interactions ( Thorsen and Lie, 2009 ) . The Neo-liberalists promote the thought of cutting down province debts, cut downing province support, altering revenue enhancement statute law to widen the revenue enhancement web, acquiring rid of pegged exchange rates, globalizing markets to merchandise by restricting economic policies that restrict trading among states, advancing denationalization, private ownership and back uping deregulating. Plant ( 2010 ) asserts that Neo-liberalism has produced an unfastened market where the province has ultimate power.


Conservatism is a belief in administrations and traditions that have developed over the old ages and have shown to be ongoing and stable. The term was devised after the 1833 Reform Act by the Tory Party when they changed their name to Conservative Party. The term has origins in Edmund Burke ‘s 1790 thought on the Gallic Revolution ( Thompson, 2011 ) . The political orientation was based on continuing tradition such as the royal household, the church and societal categories. Welfare is non paramount on the Conservative docket as they believe in work, household and nationalism.

History of Welfare

Whelan ( 2007 ) states that public assistance for the disadvantaged goes a long manner back in British history, with persons and charities such as churches running schools to educate kids and charities run intoing the lodging demands of the on the job category. The thought behind these benevolent Acts of the Apostless was to alleviate the societal conditions that industrialization had created ( Head, 2009 ) . Poor Laws were one of the first statute laws instituted in 1598 to help the hapless and the disabled in the UK by the Elizabethan authorities ( Slack, 1990 ) . The Victorian authorities continued to continue these Torahs, but in the 1900s life became hard for the working category such that it compelled the broad authorities to present assorted reforms from 1906 to 1914.

Some historiographers ‘ claim, that province public assistance ( SW ) developed from the 1601 Poor Torahs ( Thane and Whiteside, 2009 ) . Lowe ( 1993 ) asserts that the term SW was created in the 1930s, holding foremost been used derogatorily in Germany to depict the Weimar Republic ( Lowe, 1993 ; Gough, 2005 ) . Weimer was a cardinal metropolis sou’-west of Germany and the first to be associated with SW ( Harsch, 1999 ) . In the UK in 1940, during the leading of Winston Churchill, the conservative authorities became concerned about the Second World War returnee soldiers and their trust on the province to gain meaningful life. In position of this, Sir William Beveridge was tasked with analyzing the already established National insurance strategies. He produced a study which was to set up SW. The cardinal message in his study was the five ‘giant immoralities ‘ which were viz. : Want ( stand foring poorness ) ; Disease ( wellness ) , Ignorance ( deficiency of instruction ) ; Idleness ( unemployment ) and Squalor ( lodging ) ( Timmins, 2001 ) .

The Beveridge study, 1942, brought alterations to instruction that was commendable, such as advancing instruction for all ( Batterson, 1999 ) . This later led to the passage of The 1944 Education Act which was based on the Education Act 1870 that offered free instruction to all kids in the state. Through the 1944 Education Act, the authorities intended to give kids an equal opportunity in instruction by making three types of schools: secondary modern, grammar and proficient schools. Children were choice into assorted school based on the single ability ( Batterson, 1999 ) .

Beveridge ‘s study was influential and caused the authorities to get down covering with poorness and instituted constructive steps that resulted in debut of cosmopolitan benefits like The 1945 Family Allowance Act ( Pleuger, No Date ) . This act allowed all households in Britain to have hebdomadal allowances for their kids who were under 16 old ages, irrespective of their fiscal or societal position. Subsequently, other systems were introduced such as the National Insurance system that allowed lending claimants to claim hard currency benefits from it. The National Assistance Act was following introduced in 1948 and it provided aid to anybody who needed aid or was non covered by other benefits. That same twelvemonth the National Health Service ( NHS ) was besides introduced and it provided cosmopolitan wellness services. Mandated by the 1946 National Health Service Act, NHS operated on the undermentioned values: free attention, free for all with clinical demands and non based on the ability to pay ( BBC, 1998 ) . However, this state of affairs changed in 1951 when NHS started bear downing for dental intervention and prescriptions.

Beveridge ‘s study besides touched on lodging issues. There was deficit of houses after the World War II doing people to populate in sordidness, but between 1950 and 1955 the authorities tackled this job by financing local governments to construct council houses for low income households ( Burnett, 1987 ) The lodging deficits compelled the authorities to take steps to relieve badness by nationalizing public-service corporation companies as portion of the programme to command life disbursals. Thirty old ages after Beveridge ‘s ‘From Cradle to Grave ‘ study, SW became a lasting portion of British society. The economic system nevertheless took a bend for the worse with high rising prices and unemployment. Peoples were of all time more reliant on SW and there were calls for a alteration. ( Devine, 2006 )

ALSO READ  Social Work Essay

Political power changed custodies and Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister in 1979. Mrs Thatcher was of the persuasion that persons should take attention of themselves alternatively of paying high revenue enhancements to back up public services like the NHS. Hills ( 1998 ) , maintains that the Thatcher authorities emphasised on four things: denationalizing, aiming, disparity and cutting public outgo. Thatcherism as it was called introduced some far-reaching thoughts that produced agencies proving, selective public assistance and denationalization of public services ( Glendinning, 1991 ; Hills, 1998 ) . The ‘Right to Buy ‘ strategy, for case, encouraged council renters to purchase their places. All these policies reinforced belief in autonomy instead than on province ‘hand outs ‘ .

By 1997 Britain wanted a fresh brace of eyes after 18 old ages under the conservative authorities. Labour reinvented itself as New Labour with Tony Blair as Prime Minister. He introduced New Labour, denoting the find of the Third Way ( Walker, 1998 ) . New Labour believed that the path out of poorness was through work and hence constructed SW on occupations for the ‘able ‘ and protection for those who were ‘unable ‘ . Hills ( 1998, pg23 ) poses the inquiry: ‘is New Labour any different? ‘ The reply is yes and no as New Labour was seen to hold combined conservative thoughts of cutting public disbursement married with a New Labour precedence on instruction. New Labour presented a somewhat modified SW as compared to the old authorities, the Conservative. They did non nevertheless escape unfavorable judgment, which led to their licking in 2010.

A Coalition authorities has been formed and the conservativists and broad Democrats have put their caputs together to take Britain. Their purpose is to cut down the province financial shortage by cutting public outgo yet once more. The subject for SW reform is doing work wage ( Turner, 2011 ) . Disability Alliance ( 2010 ) has indicated that their administration is worried about what the alliance reforms mean to handicapped people. This is similar to the 1980s, where handicapped people faced cuts in public assistance benefits, restricted entree to work and entree to unemployment benefit taken off wholly ( Glendinning, 1991 ; Hills, 1998 ) . The Coalition authorities refers to this alteration as a move to a ‘big society ‘ chiefly aim to release some of its duties and to give persons and communities control of services ( Sutton, 2011 ) . Reformist Frank Field supports this end, keeping that similar agreements were in topographic point during the 1800s ( Sutton, 2011 ) .

Human Rights

The right to wellness attention, instruction, lodging, income care and societal services are all cardinal human rights found in province public assistance ( SW ) . The United Nations define human rights as an single constitutional right that should be enjoyed irrespective of whom you are and where you are in this universe. Each and every one is allowed to hold entree to these rights without bias ( United Nations Human Rights, 2011 ) . Amnesty International ( 2011 ) specify human rights as fundamental privileges which should be enjoyed by everybody irrespective of whom they are, where they come from, which skin coloring material they are, and irrespective of their gender, religion, lingual background or standing. The British Institute of Human Rights ( 2006 ) posits that the cardinal human rights are fairness, equality, self-respect and regard.

The term human rights was late coined, but the construct has roots in mediaeval times. Ishay ( 2004 ) asserts that development of the human rights construct has many histories. Some histories have said Kings ruled their topics in such degrading ways because they felt they had the God-given rights to make so. This led people to develop ‘man ‘ rights to battle the God given rights. Others indicate that the Quran, the Bible and eastern universe instructions have all contributed to the development of human rights ( Ishay, 2004 ) . Subrahmanyam ( 2011 ) besides purports that political battles such as Liberalism, Marxism, Socialism, etc. have all contributed to creative activity of human rights.

After the race murder committed by Adolf Hitler and his authorities during World War II, the United Nations General Assembly created the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ( UDHR ) to forestall that sort of maltreatment from of all time go oning once more. The UDHR papers has become the anchor of many pacts and human rights Torahs all over the universe ( Bailey, 2011 ) . Gleeson ( 2011 ) asserts that this papers was used by the Council of Europe to implement the European Convention on Human Rights ( ECHR ) in 1953 to safeguard human rights and basic autonomies in Europe.

The European Court of Human Rights was besides implemented by this convention and anybody who feels their rights have been abused can take their instance to this tribunal. Britain joined the convention 1951 even though it was non until 2nd October 2000 before the convention became portion of the Torahs in UK ( Jepson, 2004 ) . Another recent pact is the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ( UNCRPD ) which was signed by UK in 2008.

State Welfare enabling Disabled Peoples to exert their Rights

There have been many policies and Torahs for handicapped people since the constitution of province public assistance ( SW ) in 1945 which have enabled handicapped people to exert their rights. Bracking ( 1993 ) states that handicapped people ‘s lives have been transformed since 1939, when handicapped people started to talk for themselves. Thornes et Al ( 2000 ) maintain that there have been four countries of attention for handicapped people since the constitution of SW. The proviso of residential places, National Health Service ( NHS ) attention, educational services and income care.

There have besides been several Torahs that have assisted handicapped people in exerting their rights. The Chronically Sick and Disabled Person ‘s Act 1970, for case, was an of import jurisprudence which came to authorise handicapped people. Through this statute law councils gained authorization to supply attention, places and support to people in the community. It besides gave handicapped people the same rights to leisure and academic services ( BBC News, 2010 ) . The Seebohm Report ( 1968 ) recommendations besides led to the passage of the Local Authority Act 1970 which gave local governments the right to put up community attention.

The Education Act 1944 recommended that handicapped kids should school alongside their non-disabled equals ( Barnes, 1991 ) . The Warnock Report influenced the 1981 Education Act by urging that handicapped kids be educated with their non-disabled equals. The Particular Educational Needs Act 2001 gave disabled kids, parents and carers the right to be educated in mainstream schools if sensible accommodation could be made. The Employment Act 1994 made working easier for handicapped people even though the quota system did assist employers to know apart against handicapped people ( Barnes, 1991 ) .

The 1948 National Assistance Act gave aid and support to people in demand and replaced the Poor Law. It besides gave local governments the responsibility to supply community attention services for the ill, handicapped, the aged and other people. The 1946 National Health Service provided advice, intervention and attention to the state free of charge ( BBC News, 1998 ) . The NHS and Community Care Act 1990 promoted community attention which has benefited many handicapped people.

The Community Care ( Direct Payments ) Act 1996, gave local societal services the power to do hard currency payments, but were non effected until 2003, when it became compulsory to offer it to eligible people after appraisal. This allows persons to purchase and pull off their ain attention proviso. Disabled people besides have available to them the Access to Personal Files Act 1987, which gives them the freedom to entree any notes or studies about them held by administrations. Access to Health Records 1986, portion of the Data Protection Act, gives persons the right to wellness records.

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995, which has been replaced in many respects by the Equality Act 2010, precautions disabled people from being discriminated against in instruction, employment, entree to goods and services, purchasing and leasing. The Equality Duty 2006 demands that public organic structures provide services that promote equality. Social security benefits have besides become significant from the low Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefits and the War Injuries Disabilities Pension to Disability Living Allowance and Carers Allowance which supports excess cost incurred as a consequence of a individual ‘s damage. Long term illness aid like Income Related Employment and Support Allowance, Severe Disablement Allowance and Attendance Allowance are in topographic point to back up handicapped people. Further support can be acquired through Working Tax Credit, Income Support, Pension Credit, Housing and Council Tax Benefit ( DirectGov, 2011 ) .

Autonomous attention strategies like Direct Payments, Personal Budgets and Independent Living strategies besides allow handicapped people to entree chances like their non-disabled equals ( Barnes and Mercer 2006 ) . Bracking ( 1993 ) affirms that Independent Living gives claimants the freedom to populate on their ain. Furthermore, it allows handicapped people to do and be portion of determination devising procedures. Disabled people are able to choose and organize services for themselves and non trust on their local authorization or other administrations to supply them. The Mobility and Blue Badge Scheme allows handicapped people to purchase or rent a auto and give aid with parking. Barnes ( 2004 ) purports that independent life can alter the value of handicapped people ‘s life.

State Welfare has diminished Rights

British Institute of Human Rights ( 2006 ) states that human rights are non merely concerned with statute law but impacts on services provided by the province like residential attention, academic establishments, infirmaries and support workers in handicapped peoples place. Barnes and Oliver ( 1991 ) posit that SW ‘cradle to sculpt ‘ promise of safeguarding its participant ‘s has non worked or else there would non be a demand for a disablement favoritism jurisprudence. The province has hence non merely been unsuccessful in procuring handicapped people ‘s cardinal rights, it has impinged and limited some of them. The Socialist ( 2010 ) highlights a recent instance in which a handicapped adult female ‘s UN convention Rights and human rights have been ignored by being asked to have on incontinence tablets alternatively of utilizing a toilet at dark because of the cost of using a carer. If the local authorization wins this instance it will hold large deductions for handicapped people across the state.

ALSO READ  People Employed For Shift Work Social Work Essay

Federation of Disabled Peoples ( 2011 ) purports that the Education Secretary, Michael Grove, was late informed that non dialoguing over the thought of cutting school constructing strategies resulted in non sing equality concerns. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education ( CSIE ) ( No Date ) propound that inclusive instruction is portion of the international human rights jurisprudence. Disabled people have been contending for inclusive instruction since SW began and the 1944 Education Act was enacted Although it was stipulated in the Act that disabled kids should be educated alongside their equals it ne’er materialised. The Warnock Report in 1978 found that one in five kids would necessitate particular educational support at one point or another during their school life. The study hence recommended unit are created on school premises to suit such demands ( Warnock Report, 1978 ) .These recommendations influenced the 1981 Education Act which besides asked for kids to be ‘statemented ‘ before being placed in particular schools. It moreover, gave parents the right to appeal against their kids particular needs appraisals. The 1981 Education Act besides failed to set up inclusion, integrating and handiness breeching handicapped people ‘s right to entree educational establishments at any given clip.

Rieser and Mason ( 1992 ) indicated that non much had been changed by the 1990s. Disabled kids were still being educated with the medical position alternatively of a course of study. This led to many finishing their schooling without proper making ( House of Commons, 1999 ) . This breeched their right to obtain official acknowledgment for a class they have completed. The 1993 Education Act tried to give parents more rights to appeal against determinations by the Local Education Authority ( LEA ) to direct their kid to particular needs school. The Act besides extended LEA ‘s clip frames for measuring kids with disablement and encouraged inclusive instruction. Part of the subsequent 1996 Education Act identified and modified certain subdivisions in the jurisprudence leting parents to take if their kids were to go to chief watercourse schools.

The passage of the Particular Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001 brought handicapped kids near to inclusion. LEA were now under responsibility to supply mainstream instruction for kids if that was the want of their parents but this should non be to the hurt of non-disabled pupils ( Vaughan, No Date ) . Disability and Equality Duty 2006 gave public services the responsibility to better equality in all their services bringing. The most recent Equality Act 2010 besides demands that all those supplying services like instruction to supply just and equal services to people.

The conceptualization of traveling towards an all inclusion option for instruction for people with disablement has made in roads with the debut of the Education Act ( Virvan 1992 ) . Policies and Green documents such as ‘Excellence for All Children: Meeting Particular Educational Needs, 1997 ‘ and the promotion of engineering have non been able to turn to significantly the challenges that face handicapped people in instruction. Johnson and Cohen ( 1984 ) suggest that challenges in the schoolroom, communicating degrees and entire societal inclusion are still non to the full addressed go forthing handicapped people ‘s right to effectual instruction breached.

The Office for National Statistics Labour Force Survey 2009 indicates that UK soon has 1.3 million handicapped people ready and free to work. 50 % of people with disablement at employable age are really employed as equated to 80 % of people without disablements. It is besides noted that the type of disablement besides influences the figures significantly. For illustration, merely 20 % per cent of people with mental wellness troubles are in work. About 23 % have non got any educational certificates in comparing to nine per cent of people without disablements. Non-disabled people get approximately & A ; lb ; 12.30 in equation to & A ; lb ; 11.08 that disabled people get ( Shaw Trust 2011 ) . These figures grounds the disadvantages disabled people face in employment.

Lindbeck ( 1996 ) states that Keynesian thought of full employment and Beveridge cosmopolitan province public assistance ( SW ) system root from the same roots. In Britain for case, the authorities ‘s committed to supplying employment, cosmopolitan province public assistance and wellbeing to its citizens but handicapped people had less opportunities of being in work than their non-disabled equals in the 1970 ‘s. These figures improved in the 1980 ‘s because a batch of non-disabled people were out of work. By the 1990 ‘s things had become worse with 21 % against 7 % of non-disabled people were out of work. Fagin and Little ( 1984 ) averment that people have self-respect, sense of belonging and duty in working clasp true. Most handicapped people nevertheless, are stuck on province benefits because of unemployment and under employment state of affairss. Where is their right to esteem for their private and household life, place and correspondence if they can non be involved in community life?

Barnes ( 1992 ) propounds that grounds given about troubles that disabled people face in employment is out-dated and no longer acceptable. Although the 1944 Employment Act was designed to give handicapped people chances in paid work the quota system undermined it. The Disability Discrimination Act and Equality Act 2010 were all designed to battle employer attitude and favoritism but there remain barriers like medical showing, age, instruction, experience, transit, visual aspect and environmental factors that need to be addressed to let the handicapped individual to take part actively in employment.

Berry ( 2010 ) advocates that the thought of province public assistance ( SW ) was to eliminate divisions amongst people, but seems like the impact of the SW has made these divisions even more noticeable. He farther asserts that the belongings division among belongings holders and tenants is emphasized than of all time. Equality Human Rights Commission EQHRC ( 2011 ) province that there are certain rights a individual has in relation to lodging and place ownership. One of them are to hold and please in the ownership of belongings, but clearly having your ain place is something that most handicapped people do non hold the power to get. Derbyshire Coalition of Disabled People ( DCODP ) ( 1986 ) province every individual has the authorization to brood in a place in any mean topographic point but critics have said this is non possible because there is deficiency of houses in UK more so accessible places.

Although the 1970 Chronically Sick and Disabled Person Act requires local governments to supply the lodging demands of handicapped people, most councils have sold their belongingss and have small stock left ( BCODP, 1987 ) . Some Local governments have to work with other administrations to run into the lodging demands of handicapped people. Adjustment and supported lodging are normally few and further off from town Centres, therefore insulating handicapped people and transgressing their right to independent life. Disabled people besides normally have to travel through a medical appraisal to acquire into societal lodging. This pattern has been slammed by handicapped observers recommending that it is prejudiced ( BCODP, 1987 ) . The Housing Act 1988 did non include handicapped people in buying council flats and houses in the 1980s. Peck ( 2011 ) submits that a batch of people with disablements can non acquire aid to enable them avert being homeless. Those who do acquire housed sometimes face houses with versions that are non up to standard ( Heywood, 2001 ) .

State public assistance ( SW ) amongst other things was to supply fiscal aid that will alleviate poorness and make societal protection for all citizens. However, handicapped people do non look to hold experienced this alleviation. Carvel ( 2005 ) asserts that three in 10s handicapped people who are employable are hapless and this spread is widening irrespective of what the province is making to battle social disability. Smith ( 2008 ) advocates that the charity Leonard Cheshire Disability ‘s recent study reveals three million handicapped people in UK in 2008 lived in comparative poorness.

Palmer ( No Date ) states that about a 3rd of people with disablement falling between ages 25 and 65 onwards live in hapless households, half of Non-disabled peoples figure. Disabled people are hapless because they frequently do non work. Statisticss indicated that about 60 % of handicapped people are non employable in contrast to 15 % of non-disabled people ( Palmer, No Date ) . A big per centum of handicapped people are willing to work but can non happen employment. Disabled people frequently do non hold the certificates required for working. 75 % of people who are of employable age and on benefits are either ailment or have a disablement.

The 1988 disablement study conducted by the Office of National Statistics confirms this want. The study recognised that most handicapped people rely on societal security benefits, but the 1988 benefit reforms did non see these findings and cut societal security disbursement which in bend affected handicapped people. DisabledGo ( 2010 ) advocator that Equality Human Rights Commission ( EHRC ) is discerning about the authoritiess Work Capability Assessment trial and the impact it is holding on Employment Support Allowance claimants. Cooper ( 2010 ) asserts that the 2011 lodging benefit reforms will do a batch of people homeless. The authorities ‘s program to cut public disbursement and alleviate itself of some its duties will sabotage strategies and programmes that support handicapped people. This will necessarily eat handicapped peoples right.

The National Health Service posits that handicapped people have unbearable challenges accessing their services ( Department of Health, 1999 ) The National Health Service ‘s nucleus value is to supply wellness attention for all in UK but it is evident this non the instance. Wide spread favoritism has been reported by assorted administrations and the media. Brindle ( 2008 ) and Triggle ( 2007 ) submits that an official enquiry has found that NHS discriminates against people with larning troubles. They further alleges that the chief defect of the NHS is the deficiency of cognition in larning disablement issues. Disability News Service ( 2009 ) province a recent study by Every Disabled Child Matters indicates that handicapped kids are being let down by the NHS despite holding the resources to back up them.

ALSO READ  My Career as Social Work Practitioner Essay

Aspis ( 2006 ) alleges that handicapped people ‘s right to life is in today threatened, as medical staffs are allowed to do life and decease determinations about handicapped people without doing clinical mentions. He further alleges that scientific experimentations like cistron use and pre-natal showing could pass over out handicapped people in the non excessively distant hereafter. Fitch ( 2011 ) highlights the station codification lottery which is allowing down some NHS disabled patients. As one Primary Care Trust differentiates from another wellness attention has become prejudiced.

The function of professionals in perpetuating dependence

Morris ( 1994 ) postulates that the inability of statutory administrations to help handicapped people in taking independent lives weakens their human and civil rights. Disability observers assert that disablement is a civil rights issue and the inability to protect it stems from the fact that professionals such as physicians, nurses, societal workers, attention helpers, physical therapists sustain their life rendition services to handicapped people. Gallic ( 1994 ) alleges that these professionals wield power in their relationship with handicapped people. Boyfriend and French ( 2001 ) indicate that this power relationship stems from the fact that disabled people were segregated by medical professionals. They further province that this segregation created dependence. Oliver ( 1991 ) takes the base point that SW was designed to take attention of the demands of those who provide its services than those who are meant to profit from it. He farther asserts that approximately 70 % of the Social and Health budget outgo services staff salaries doing non-disabled people larger consumers of the occupation chances in SW.

Wolfensberger ( 1989 ) besides asserts that the province induces the demand for human services particularly with the coming of station primary production. This position is shared by Oliver ( 1991 ) . He asserts that the debut of 1970 Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act and the Education Act 1981 produced assorted professionals who brought issues like unintegrated instruction, attention helpers, psychologist etc. which takes a big per centum of the support given to handicapped people. Morris ( 1994 ) asserts that community attention for case, is promoted to give handicapped people independency by professionals and province functionaries but it really does non run like that on the land. It frequently takes away the independency of handicapped people and has been described by some handicapped people as dictatorial ( Morris, 1994 ) . It puts professionals in power and the handicapped individual at the inactive terminal.

The function of the Disabled People ‘s motion in disputing public assistance province proviso, developing alternate policies and services

The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People ( BCODP ) ( 1997 ) posits that SW was established to battle poorness and give people entree to wellness attention. Davis ( 1996 ) asserts that anterior to SW the disadvantaged in society were controlled by the Poor Laws. Even after SW was established parts of the Poor Laws were found in some of its policies. Institutionalisation of handicapped people is an illustration. Davis ( 1996 ) states that handicapped people gaining this, put out to revolutionize their fortunes in an influential and planned manner. They created administrations which are run by handicapped people for handicapped people to recommend for handicapped people.

Recommending for handicapped people, nevertheless, started in the 1800 ‘s with the British Deaf Association and the National League of the Blind. These administrations routed for betterments for the deaf and blind. Later, a group of people led by Paul Hunt who had been disputing the governments over the release of handicapped people formed the Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation ( UPIAS ) ( Hunt, 2001 ) . This group subsequently brought together other little groups around the state to organize the BCODP. Subsequently, other administrations have been formed such as the Greater Manchester Coalation of handicapped people ( GMCDP ) and many more.

Lister ( 2001 ) posits that the handicapped people ‘s motion has had an of import influence on province public assistance ( SW ) proviso by combating to allow welfare proviso portray the societal theoretical account of disablement. She farther asserts that the motion has worked hard for SW to recognize handicapped people ‘s demands and supply equal societal security benefits. Another salient point raised by Lister is how the motion has been able to do handicapped people the focal point in public assistance schemes alternatively of being merely the mark. Oliver ( 1991 ) besides emphasises that the handicapped people ‘s motion will proactively undertake subjugation and favoritism against handicapped people in countries where services are provided. Samuel ( 2010 ) for illustration promulgates that the disablement motion are up in weaponries about the recent proposed cuts in Disability Living Allowance mobility constituent.

Campbell and Oliver ( 1996 ) assert that the handicapped people ‘s motion has been instrumental in the development of strategies like the independent life. The handicapped people ‘s motion has earnestly addressed issues like the instability of power between handicapped people and professionals which is said to make dependance. This led to the debut of direct payments and personal budgets ( Barnes, and Mercer 2005 ) .

How force per unit area to take barriers may be reduced through province public assistance

Carter ( 2002 ) posits that even though she has Rheumatoid Arthritis she has kept her occupation and has been able to compose an article because she is able to afford assistive engineering. Other handicapped people who have the same damage but can non afford the available engineering happen it instead hard to keep on to their occupations. Removing disenabling barriers is of import to enable handicapped people to take part to the full in society. However, SW is non ever helpful in helping handicapped people in exerting their rights. An express illustration is the Warnock study ( 1978 ) which identified disenabling barriers in instruction but besides questioned the capableness of handicapped people.

The 1944 Employment Act is another illustration of passage which introduced the quota system to promote employers in taking on a per centum of handicapped employees but was non enforced by wining authoritiess ( Barnes and Mercer, 2005 ) . Labour ‘s recent ‘welfare to work ‘ program has besides non worked peculiarly good with the unviable gaps that lead to people being better off at place than at work ( Barnes and Mercer, 2005 ; Sparow, 2003 ) . The recent work capableness appraisal is a tough trial and is doing out that a batch of handicapped people are capable of working when they are clearly non able to ( Gentleman, 2011 ) . The alliance SW reforms will farther worsen the inauspicious conditions disabled people face on a day-to-day footing.


This essay has sought to measure the claim that SW has non merely failed handicapped individuals but has besides infringed on their human rights. This has been achieved by analyzing statute laws, following the history of origin and constitution of SW. It further ascertained that human rights are for everybody and ensures persons and administrations treat people with equity, equality, self-respect and regard ( British Institute of Human Rights ( BIHR ) ( 2006:6 ) . These four aforementioned values organize the footing of Beveridge ‘s province public assistance ( SW ) . His five ‘evil ‘ giants ‘ ignorance, idling, want, sordidness and disease to topographic point citizens on a flat playing field with the wealthy. SW was besides to do authorities the chief supplier of security, economic and societal wellbeing. Furthermore, give citizens equal chance, impartial distribution of wealths and communal duty for people who are unable to supply for themselves.

Despite the above rhetoric certain subdivisions of the society such as handicapped people are yet to see to the full fairness, equality, self-respect and regard in SW. Disabled people have come far from Poor Laws which merely aim were to relieve poorness ( Morgan, 1948 ) . The 1970 Chronically Sick Person Act, Employment Act 1944, Education Act 1944, 1981, Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and many more have changed the disablement landscape in UK. Pressures from the disablement motions, administrations and militant have helped control disablement favoritism and subjugation through the debut of strategies such as independent life, direct payment, personal budget and basic income which have given disable people autonomy and pick.

There is grounds that SW has non merely failed to guarantee handicapped peoples basic human rights but it has besides infringed and diminished some of those rights. Clegg ( 2010 ) posits that the SW is broken because the system has failed to transform from a safety cyberspace to a spring board. Oliver and Barnes ( 1998 ) posit that SW has non merely allow down handicapped people ; their autonomies have been contracted and impinged on. Crowther ( 2008 ) besides sounds the dismay, that even though 50 % of handicapped people are in work this figure falls to 20 % when it comes to people with mental wellness or acquisition troubles.

Lithgow ( 2008 ) posits that handicapped people can non acquire on the lodging ladder because of poorness. The lone option, societal lodging, has besides failed handicapped people by supplying houses that are non accessible. The National Health Service is supplying unequal attention for handicapped people particularly people with larning troubles ( London Evening Standard, 2009 ) Disabled peoples benefit have been cut doing them to populate below comparative poorness. If handicapped people are non acquiring full entree to lodging, employment, societal security, instruction and wellness attention so the purpose of the SW to supply security, economic and societal wellbeing for all citizens has failed and breached their basic human rights.