The PCS theoretical account ( Thompson 2001 ) has three homocentric rings ( inside to outside: P-C-S ) . The “P” bases for personal bias or the personal. psychological degree ; the “C” stands for the cultural level- consensus. commonalty. conformance ; the “S” degree bases for the structural degree. ( Ledwith 128 ) Apply: This theoretical account is utile for community development because it allows us to see how different degrees of interaction and analysis from the personal to social and structural affect life. Specifically in footings of favoritism we can interrupt down the grounds behind issues of inequality in society- where do they come from?
How were they built? Peoples in communities are all at different degrees within their PCS model- people are influenced and affected by the lives they lead- when they were raised by their parents. how they raise their ain household. You need to take this into account- where are people found in these PCS rings? You besides need to retrieve that the PCS rings ARE homocentric and they DO impact each other. When seeking to turn to issues such as favoritism. you need to calculate out which circle might be the impulsive force. and where you can step in in the other circles as good. Adapt: I think we’re get downing to see how many of these theories can be adapted to other Fieldss.
I think the biggest takeout is cognizing that people are at different developmental phases. Someone’s personal biass are frequently extremely influenced by the civilization and construction they were raised in ( frequently non a pick ) . It’s easy to assail person for their personal beliefs. particularly when you don’t cognize where they’re coming from. I think we can accommodate this theoretical account to any state of affairs covering with societal justness issues. You need to unknot these circles. cognizing they affect each other.