All inaugural references use tools of rhetoric, Nelson Mandela gave an inaugural reference. Therefore, Mandela’s inaugural reference uses tools of rhetoric. As stated by Campbell and Jamieson, “inauguration is a right of transition, and hence creates a demand for the freshly elected president to do a public reference – these references have a man-made nucleus in which certain rhetorical elements … are fused into an indivisible whole” ( 1990 ) . This analysis essay will discourse the frequently elusive but effectual tools of rhetoric used in inaugural references. concentrating on former South African President Nelson Mandela’s, in peculiar, I will reason that the creative activity of integrity is the overruling rhetorical intent of the inaugural reference as a genre. which is synonymous with Burke’s theory of designation To get down with. I will supply some background information on the inaugural reference as a rhetorical genre. Following this. I will discourse the places of the writer and audience (the rhetorical state of affairs). and associate these places to Aristotle’s construct of ethos and poignancy; I will travel on to analyse the entreaties and figure of speechs exercised by Mandela in his inaugural reference; all of these rhetorical elements. I will reason. concept integrity and carry the people of South Africa to take their first stairss towards reunion.
The inaugural reference can be considered a rhetorical genre. as it is a recognizable sort of address with “similar signifiers that portion substantial. stylistic. and situational characteristics” ( Tarvin. 2008 ) . The inaugural reference is ceremonial and traditional in nature. and can be characterized by Aristotelean theoreticians as epideictic oratory. which is oratory that takes topographic point on particular occasions ; the writer “celebrates the event for an audience of … chap citizens by appealing to common values and cultural traditions” ( Killingsworth. 2005 ) . The address symbolizes a alteration in authorities. and is the freshly elected President’s first official public reference. Corbett and Connors have observed that “inaugural references normally deal in wide. undeveloped generalisations. Principles. policies. and promises are enunciated without elaboration” ( 1999 ) . while Sigelman points out that presidents “typically use the juncture to mark the nation’s yesteryear. to visualize its hereafter. and to seek to put the tone for [ following ] years” ( 1996 ) . Campbell and Jamieson define five cardinal elements that distinguish the inaugural reference as a genre.
The presidential inaugural: “unifies the audience by restructuring its members as the people. who can witness and sign the ceremonial ; rehearses communal values drawn from the past ; sets forth the political rules that will regulate the new disposal ; and demonstrates through passage that the president appreciates the demands and restrictions of executive maps. Finally. each of these terminals must be achieved … while pressing contemplation non action. concentrating on the present while integrating past and future. and praising the establishment of presidential term and the values and signifier of the authorities of which it is a portion ( Campbell and Jamieson. 1990 ) . Note that fusion of the audience ( which is synonymous with Burke’s theory of designation ) constitutes the “most cardinal [ component ] that demarcate [ s ] the inaugural reference as a rhetorical genre” ( Sigelman. 1996 ) . which is the overruling statement of this paper. I would besides wish to indicate out the three chief places in any piece of rhetoric. as stated by Killingsworth ( 2005 ) : the place of the writer ( Mandela. for the intent of this essay ) . the place of the audience ( immediate and secondary audiences ) . and the place of value to which the writer refers ( the integrity of Whites and inkiness).
The author’s rhetorical end is to travel the audience towards his place via a shared place of values. which consequences in the alliance of the three places ( writer. audience. and value ) . Therefore. Mandela’s rhetorical end is to travel his immediate and secondary audience of both protagonists and critics towards his place as the freshly elected black President of South Africa by the shared end of fusion of all races within the state. Put another manner. Kenneth Burke. in his work “A Rhetoric of Motives” describes the basic map of rhetoric as the “use of words by human agents to organize attitudes or bring on actions in other human agents” ( 1969 ) . In order to aline attitudes of writer. audience. and value. or in order to organize attitudes to bring on action in other human agents. the first consideration in the building of the address must be the audience. Before I discuss audience though. I will speak about the place of Mandela – the writer of the inaugural reference in inquiry.
Corbett and Connors ( 1999 ) point out that when making a rhetorical analysis. one must ever see the particular state of affairs that faces the talker. Nelson Mandela was elected as the first black president in South Africa on May 10th. 1994 ; this election was peculiarly important because it was the first of all time multi-racial. democratic election in the country’s history. It besides signaled the terminal of the apartheid ( from the Afrikaans word for “apartness” or “separateness” ) . which was both a motto and a societal and political policy of racial segregations and favoritism. enforced by the White National party from 1948 until Mandela’s election. However. racial segregation has characterized South Africa since white colonists arrived in 1652. before apartheid. Furthermore. Mandela spent 27 old ages as a political captive in South Africa for his function as a freedom combatant and leader of the African National Congress ( ANC ) . and his important part to anti-apartheid activities.
All of these factors established some uncertainties in Mandela. particularly in the heads of white South Africans. Mandela “had to turn to the really legitimate demands of black South African people while forestalling the flight of white South Africans and foreign capital from the state … [ and his inaugural reference ] needed to [ rhetorically ] set up the land from which advancement would grow” ( Sheckels. 2001 ) . Because of these changing fortunes. the inaugural reference might be “an juncture when a powerful ethical entreaty would hold to be exerted if the assurance and enterprises of the people were to be aroused” ( Corbett and Connors. 1999 ) . However. while these factors established uncertainties in some. they besides contributed to Mandela’s ethos. which is defined by Aristotle as the character or credibleness of the rhetor. Aristotle claims “It is necessary non merely to look at the statement. that it may be demonstrative and persuasive but besides [ for the talker ] to build a position of himself as a certain sort of person” ( Aristotle in Borchers. 2006 ) . As stated in Killingsworth. “authors demonstrate their character … in every utterance” ( 2005 ) .
A individual who possesses “practical wisdom. virtuousness. and good will … is needfully persuasive to the hearers” ( Borchers. 2006 ) . Mandela possesses considerable ethos as a consequence of his personal individuality and regional history ; his engagement with the ANC. the political party whose purpose was to support the rights and freedoms of African people. and the clip he served as a political captive show his dedication to the building of a democratic state. One writer notes that Mandela serves as a “representative of the African people at large” ( Sheckels. 2001 ) . The public’s cognition of Mandela’s past allows him to set up ethos. which in bend helps him present a rhetorically successful inaugural reference. which serves in the building of integrity between all people of South Africa. Additionally. as one writer points out. ethos “may take several signifiers – a powerful leader like the President will frequently hold the ethos of credibleness that comes from authority” ( Tuman. 2010 ) .
While Mandela uses his yesteryear to build ethos. he besides additions ethos as South Africa’s freshly elected President. Because it was the first of all time democratic election. in which his party won 62 % of the ballots. Mandela additions authorization over past South African Presidents ; his call to office represents the wants and demands of all people in South Africa. while his predecessors’ did non. Mandela’s accumulated ethos contributes to the persuasive power of his inaugural reference. in which he makes his first official effort as President to set up integrity through address. Following I will discourse the place of the audience. When building a address. the writer must foremost see who his specific audience is: “consideration of audience thrusts the creative activity of an effectual persuasive message” ( Tuman. 2010 ) . When composing his inaugural address. which is a signifier of unwritten rhetoric. Mandela had to see both an immediate audience. every bit good as a secondary audience who would watch the address through the medium of Television and listen to it on the wireless.
The audience consisted non merely of South Africans. but of people across the universe interested and inspired by this monumental minute in history. Furthermore. Mandela had to see both hearers who were his protagonists and hearers who were his antagonists. Corbett and Connors claim that “the larger and more heterogenous the audience is. the more hard it is to set the discourse to suit the audience. In his content and his manner. the President must strike some common denominator – but [ one ] that does non fall below the self-respect that the juncture demands” ( Killingsworth. 2005 ) . One such manner that Mandela adjusts his discourse to suit his audience is his pick in enunciation. While he does prosecute in the usage of figure of speechs and rhetorical entreaties. he besides uses reasonably common linguistic communication throughout. This is particularly of import in his state of affairs. as many of his black hearers were denied instruction by the Whites. and therefore had limited vocabularies.
While Mandela wanted to make out to the educated citizens and international invitees. he besides had to guarantee that his lupus erythematosus educated hearers were able to hold on his words and therefore be affected by the emotionalism of his reference and persuaded to unify. When analysing Mandela’s Inaugural reference in consideration of audience. we may besides observe his opening line: “Your Statelinesss. Your Highnesses. Distinguished Guests. Comrades. and Friends. ” Here he acknowledges both the “distinguished international invitees. ” every bit good as the people of South Africa: “Comrades and Friends. ” Acknowledging members of the international and internal audience is a tradition of inaugural references with rhetorical value. Kennedy. for illustration. followed this tradition when he began his inaugural reference: “Vice President Johnson. Mr. Speaker. Mr. Chief Justice. President Eisenhower. Vice President Nixon. President Truman. Reverend Clergy. Fellow Citizens. ” as did Roosevelt when he began: “Mr. Chief Justice. Mr. Vice President. My Friends” ( Wolfarth. 1961 ) .
Additionally. we may observe that it is traditional for inaugural references to “abound with unity appeals” ( Wolfarth. 1961 ) . which unite the president to the citizens of the state for which he reigns. President Jefferson. for illustration. addressed “Friends and Fellow-Citizens” in his gap line ; Pierce opened with “My countrymen ; ” while Lincoln saluted his “Fellow-Citizens of the United States” in the first lines of his 2nd inaugural reference ( Wolfarth. 1961 ) . An reference incorporating official salutes every bit good as integrity entreaties causes all audiences to place with the President. We may besides observe extra integrity entreaties throughout Mandela’s inaugural reference. There is a permeant usage of personal pronouns. such as “we. ” “us. ” and “our. ” along with “symbolically potent footings that embody a sense of collectivity” ( Sigelman. 1996 ) . such as “South Africa/Africans” “homeland. ” “people. ” and “country. ” all of which connote community and contribute to the building of integrity. Mandela begins 15 out of 30 subdivisions ( as designated in the index ) with “we” or “our. ” and they constitute 59 of the 893 words in the reference ( 6. 6 % ) .
The repeat of the word “we” at the beginning of subsequent sentences is a rhetorical figure of speech called ‘anaphora ; ’ by utilizing this rhetorical technique. Mandela subtly emphasizes the importance of integrity As one writer explains. the strategic usage of personal pronouns is “one reasonably elusive agencies of conveying a feeling of unity” ( Sigelman. 1996 ) . Entreaties to unity follow in Burke’s theory of designation as a agency of persuasion or cooperation. By turn toing “Comrades and Friends” and utilizing the words “we” and “us” throughout the address. Mandela is unifying the audience with himself. every bit good as each other – a “powerful. yet elusive. type of designation … The word ‘we’ reinforces the thought that all of the [ listening ] community is united in its attempts to carry through [ certain ] goals” ( Borchers. 2006 ) . The orator who entreaties to an audience to the point where designation takes topographic point has accomplished the intent of his rhetoric ( Burke. 1969 ) . Mandela’s usage of personal pronouns and footings that embody collectivity concept integrity. which is the overruling intent of both his inaugural reference. every bit good as his Presidency in general.
Mandela’s inaugural reference besides employs poignancy. which is an entreaty to the emotions of one’s audience that serves as a persuasive power. Aristotle argued that a talker must understand the emotions of one’s audience in order to be persuasive ( Borchers. 2006 ) ; that is. he must understand his audience’s province of head. against whom their emotions are directed. and for what kinds of grounds people feel the manner they do. in order to link emotionally with them. Mandela’s startup was an emotional twenty-four hours for the people of South Africa and the universe. because it represented a displacement towards democracy. equality. and freedom for all people. One writer notes that “Mandela’s foremost presidential reference before the freshly constituted South African Parliament lifted South Africa from the kingdom of fanciful democracy into a province of existent democratic pattern and was a self-referential act of conveying opposing parties together.
The [ startup ] address was the first illustration of Reconstruction and development after apartheid … in words – and words entirely – [ Mandela’s ] address reconstitute [ vitamin D ] the nation” ( Salazar. 2002 ) . We can see Mandela’s usage of poignancy throughout his startup address. For illustration. he refers to the yesteryear as an “extraordinary homo disaster” ( 3 ) ; he enlists his fellow South Africans to “produce an existent South African world that will reenforce humanity’s belief in justness. beef up its assurance in the aristocracy of the human psyche and prolong all our hopes for a glorious life for all” ( 4 ) ; he discusses “the deepness of the hurting we all carried in our Black Marias as we saw our state rupture itself apart in a awful struggle … saw it spurned. outlawed and isolated by the peoples of the world” ( 9 ) ; and he refers to his win as “a common triumph for justness. for peace. for human dignity” ( 11 ) and his oppositions as “blood-thirsty forces which still refuse to see the light” ( 14 ) .
Mandela so makes an emotional pledge: “we pledge ourselves to emancipate all our people from the go oning bondage of poorness. want. agony. gender. and other favoritism … we shall construct a society in which all South Africans. both black and white. will be able to walk tall. without any fright in their hearts” ( 16-18 ) . He so dedicates “this twenty-four hours to all the heroes and heroines … who sacrificed … and surrendered their lives so that we could be free” ( 20 ) . The rhetorical usage of poignancy is thick throughout Mandela’s inaugural reference. Mandela’s entreaties to integrity besides contribute to the poignancy of the address by animating the hearers to fall in together as one. instead than opposing entities. Mandela concludes with a promise: “never. ne’er and ne’er once more shall it be that this beautiful land will once more see the subjugation … and endure the indignity of being the rotter of the universe. / Let freedom reign” ( 28-29 ) . It is besides of import to observe Mandela’s usage of what rhetorical bookmans have called ‘ideographs. ’ which are defined as “high-level abstraction [ s ] that encapsulate or summarize the unequivocal rules or ideals of a political culture” ( Parry-Giles & A ; Hogan. 2010 ) .
I would wish to add that the usage of ideogram employs Aristotle’s construct of poignancy. as the words are frequently emotionally loaded. Examples of ideogram used in Mandela’s inaugural reference include: “liberty” ( 2 ) ; “nobility” ( 4 ) ; “justice” ( 4. 11. 26 ) ; “peace” ( 11. 26 ) ; “human dignity” ( 11. 18 ) ; “freedom” ( 17. 21. 29 ) ; and “hope” ( 1. 18 ) . Freedom is the most important ideogram in the address. as Mandela was a ‘freedom-fighter’ and was ‘freed’ from prison in 1990. which was a major measure towards ‘freedom’ for all South Africans. Ideographs. claim rhetorical bookmans. “have the possible to unite diverse audiences around mistily shared sets of meaning” ( Parry-Giles & A ; Hogan. 2010 ) . Yet once more we are presented with entreaties to integrity in Mandela’s inaugural reference. As discussed. Mandela’s address provides grounds that he understands his audience’s province of head ( a mixture of apprehensiveness and optimism ) . against whom their emotions are directed ( Mandela himself. every bit good as the apartheid ) . and for what kinds of grounds people feel the manner they do ( alter. fright. history. etc. ) .
Therefore. he was able to link emotionally with his audience. which is Aristotle’s apprehension of Pathos. I will go on my analysis of Mandela’s address with consideration of entreaties he makes to put and race. Killingsworth points out that “appeals to race … frequently work together with entreaties to place” ( 2005 ) . In Mandela’s startup address he says: “Each one of us is as closely attached to the dirt of this beautiful state as are the celebrated Brazilian rosewood trees of Pretoria and the silver wattle trees of the bushveld. /Each clip one of us touches the dirt of this land. we feel a sense of personal reclamation. The national temper alterations as the seasons change. /We are moved by a sense of joy and excitement when grass turns green and the flowers bloom. /That religious and physical unity we all portion with this common fatherland … . ” ( 6-9 ) . This claim on the land can be thought of as an designation of race with topographic point. or in footings of Kenneth Burke’s dramatism. a ratio between agent and scene. who and where ( Killingsworth. 2005 ) . When white colonists arrived in South Africa in the 1600s. they began displacing autochthonal black dwellers from their fatherland. forcing them onto “less desirable terrain where H2O was relatively scarce. croping hapless and agricultural conditions harsh” ( Horrell. 1973 ) .
Apartheid made the separation of inkinesss with their fatherland even more acute with the execution of designated group countries. in which inkinesss were relocated to slums and townships. separate from Whites. Hook. in Killingsworth. claims that “collective black self-recovery can merely take topographic point when we begin to regenerate our relationship to the Earth. when we remember the manner of our ancestors” ( 2005 ) . Mandela’s entreaties to race and topographic point in his inaugural reference advocate corporate self-recovery. and. as a by-product. integrity. Burke notes that “rhetors who feature the scene see the universe as comparatively lasting … [ and ] rhetors who features the agent see people as rational and capable of doing choices” ( Borchers. 153 ) . By having both scene and agent. it is apparent that Mandela sees the physical geographics of South Africa as unchanging. and besides sees that the people who inhabit South Africa have the power to take to unify on that shared district.
Integrity is the implicit in subject of Mandela’s inaugural reference every bit good as his presidential term: the integrity of white and black people ; the disintegration of apartheid and its associated segregation ; the reunion of native South Africans with their fatherland ; and the fusion of South Africa with the remainder of the free democratic universe. “When [ Mandela ] took up the reins of power in 1994. the universe was keeping its breath. anticipating the racial tensenesss dividing the state to detonate into a blood bath. Alternatively. the universe witnessed a miracle. Mandela’s accomplishment is colossal” ( Davis. 1997 ) . Mandela’s inaugural reference served as an instrument of reunion and produced an ambiance of stableness from which the new system of authorities could travel frontward.
Your Statelinesss. Your Highnesses. Distinguished Guests. Comrades and Friends:
Today. all of us do. by our presence here. and by our jubilations in other parts of our state and the universe. confabulate glorification and hope to newborn autonomy. Out of the experience of an extraordinary human catastrophe that lasted excessively long. must be born a society of which all humanity will be proud. Our day-to-day workss as ordinary South Africans must bring forth an existent South African world that will reenforce humanity’s belief in justness. beef up its assurance in the aristocracy of the human psyche and prolong all our hopes for a glorious life for all. All this we owe both to ourselves and to the peoples of the universe who are so good represented here today. To my compatriots. I have no vacillation in stating that each one of us is as closely attached to the dirt of this beautiful state as are the celebrated Brazilian rosewood trees of Pretoria and the silver wattle trees of the bushveld. Each clip one of us touches the dirt of this land. we feel a sense of personal reclamation.
The national temper alterations as the seasons change. We are moved by a sense of joy and excitement when the grass turns green and the flowers bloom. That religious and physical unity we all portion with this common fatherland explains the deepness of the hurting we all carried in our Black Marias as we saw our state rupture itself apart in a awful struggle. and as we saw it spurned. outlawed and isolated by the peoples of the universe. exactly because it has become the cosmopolitan base of the baneful political orientation and pattern of racism and racial subjugation. We. the people of South Africa. experience fulfilled that humanity has taken us back into its bosom. that we. who were outlaws non so long ago. have today been given the rare privilege to be host to the states of the universe on our ain dirt. We thank all our distinguished international invitees for holding come to take ownership with the people of our state of what is. after all. a common triumph for justness. for peace. for human self-respect.
We trust that you will go on to stand by us as we tackle the challenges of constructing peace. prosperity. non-sexism. non-racialism and democracy. We deeply appreciate the function that the multitudes of our people and their political mass democratic. spiritual. adult females. young person. concern. traditional and other leaders have played to convey about this decision. Not least among them is my Second Deputy President. the Honest F. W. de Klerk. We would besides wish to pay testimonial to our security forces. in all their ranks. for the distinguished function they have played in procuring our first democratic elections and the passage democracy. from blood-thirsty forces which still refuse to see the visible radiation. The clip for the healing of the lesions has The minute to bridge the chasms that divide us has The clip to construct is upon us.
We have. at last. achieved our political emancipation. We pledge ourselves to emancipate all our people from the go oning bondage of poorness. want. agony. gender and other favoritism. We succeeded to take our last stairss to freedom in conditions of comparative peace. We commit ourselves to the building of a complete. merely and permanent peace. We have triumphed in the attempt to engraft hope in the chests of the 1000000s of our people. We enter into a compact that we shall construct the society in which all South Africans. both black and white. will be able to walk tall. without any fright in their Black Marias. assured of their unalienable right to human dignity–a rainbow state at peace with itself and the universe.
As a item of its committedness to the reclamation of our state. the new Interim Government of National Unity will. as a affair of urgency. turn to the issue of amnesty for assorted classs of our people who are presently functioning footings of imprisonment. We dedicate this twenty-four hours to all the heroes and heroines in this state and the remainder of the universe who sacrificed in many ways and surrendered their lives so that we could be free. Their dreams have become world. Freedom is their wages.
We are both broken and elevated by the award and privilege that you. the people of South Africa. have bestowed on us. as the first President of a united. democratic. non-racial and non-sexist South Africa. to take our state out of the vale of darkness. We understand it still that there is no easy route to freedom. We know it good that none of us moving entirely can accomplish success. We must therefore act together as a united people. for national rapprochement. for state edifice. for the birth of a new universe. Let there be justness for all.
Let there be peace for all.
Let there be work. staff of life. H2O and salt for all.
Let each cognize that for each the organic structure. the head and the psyche have been freed
to carry through themselves. Never. ne’er and ne’er once more shall it be that this beautiful land will once more see the subjugation of one by another and endure the indignity of being the rotter of the universe.
Let freedom reign.
The Sun shall ne’er put on so glorious a human accomplishment! God bless Africa!
Borchers. T. ( 2006 ) . Rhetorical theory: An debut. Waveland Press Inc. : Illinois Burke. K. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. Burke. K. ( 1966 ) . Language as symbo1ic action: Essaies on life. literature. and method. Berkeley: University of California Press. Campbell. K. K. & A ; Jamieson. K. H. ( 1990 ) . Deeds done in words: Presidential rhetoric and the genres of administration. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago. Corbett. E. P. J. & A ; Connors. R. J. ( 1999 ) Classical rhetoric for the modern pupil. Oxford University Press: New York. Davis. G. ( 1997. July 18 ) . No ordinary thaumaturgy. Electronic Mail & A ; Guardian [ On-line ] . Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. mg. co. za/mg/news/97jul2/18JUL-mandels. hypertext markup language. Horrel. M. ( 1973 ) . The African fatherlands of South Africa. USA: University of Michigan. Ali-Dinar. A. B. ( 1994 ) . Inaugural address. Pretoria [ Mandela ] . University of Pennsylvania: African surveies centre. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Africa. upenn. edu/Articles_Gen/Inaugural_Speech_17984. html Killingsworth. M. J. ( 2005 ) . Entreaties in modern rhetoric: An ordinary-language attack. Southern Illinois University Press. Parry-Giles. S. J. & A ; Hogan. J. M. ( 2010 ) . The enchiridion of rhetoric and public reference. United Kingdome: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Salazar. P. J. ( 2002 ) . An African Athinais: Rhetoric and the defining of democracy. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Sheckels. T. F. ( 2001 ) . The rhetoric of Nelson Mandela: A qualified success. Howard Journal of Communications. Vol 12-2. Sigelman. L. ( Jan-Mar 1996 ) . Presidential inaugurals: The modernisation of a genre. Political Communication. Vol 13-1. South Africa’s political parties. SouthAfrica. info. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. southafrica. info/about/democracy/polparties. htm Tarvin. D. ( 2008 ) . Vincent Fox’s inaugural reference: A comparative analysis between the generic features of the United States and Mexico. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //lsu. academe. edu/DavidTarvin/Papers/687161/Vicente_Foxs_Inaugural_Addr
ess_A_Comparative_Analysis_Between_the_Generic_Characteristics_of_the_United_States_and_Mexico Tuman. J. S. ( 2010 ) . Communicating panic: The rhetorical dimensions of terrorist act. San Francisco: Sage Publications. Wolfarth. D. L. ( April 1961 ) . John F. Kennedy in the tradition of inaugural addresss. Quarterly diary of address. Vol. 47-2. Additional Works Referenced
Foss. S. K. ( 2004 ) . Rhetorical unfavorable judgment: Exploration & A ; pattern. Illinois: Waveland Press. Inc. Hart. R. P. & A ; Daughton. S. ( 2005 ) . Modern rhetorical unfavorable judgment: Third edition. USA: Pearson Education. Inc. Kuypers. J. A. ( 2005 ) . The art of rhetorical unfavorable judgment. USA: Pearson Education Inc. Lacy. M. G. & A ; Ono. K. A. ( 2011 ) . Critical rhetorics of race. New York: New York University Press