In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid? ” Nicholas Carr explains his point of position of how the encephalon is being reprogramed due to engineering. He states that the Internet changes how we receive and process information and that surfing the web takes about no concentration and that is why we lose focus easy. Carr gives his experiences as an illustration in how he is no longer able to maintain concentration to even finish reading an article. His chief point is that hunt engines. like Google. and the cyberspace in general is damaging our ability to believe. and that we were likely better in the yesteryear when reading was done utilizing books. Through out my research I was able to happen that Carr’s point of position is erroneous.
Some of the benefits to utilizing Google usage hunt. harmonizing to Stanford University. are relevance. the ability to seek for picture and audio content every bit good as PDF. . physician and. ppt files. the ability to make progress usage hunts from sphere outside of Stanford. edu [ 1 ] .
Valerie Conners in her article. “Why does Nicholas Carr think Google is doing us stupid? Points out a really interesting neuroscience survey happening done by UCLA in 2008. Harmonizing to the survey older grownups that used and researched the Internet increased encephalon activity. which the research workers deducted that could finally better encephalon map. The research workers used magnetic resonance imagination scans taken of the participant’s brains both while reading and so when seeking in the Internet. scientists found that more countries of the encephalon showed more activity during the cyberspace hunts than while reading and specifically the encephalon was stimulated more in the countries related to complex concluding [ 2 ] .
Adam Clark in his article. “Google is Making Us Stupid and Smart at the Same Time? Challenge Carr’s thoughts bout the influence of the Internet and hunt engines in our encephalon. Clark brings 3 chief points to back up his point of position. First. “Search engines are rerouting our memory. ” Clark says that we are non losing our ability to retrieve things. alternatively the Internet is altering how we store information in our encephalon. fundamentally how we remember things. He says that the Internet is giving us tools to retrieve where to happen information that has been forgotten. Second. “Certain types of memory are bettering. ” Clark provinces that when are asked a inquiry alternatively of looking for an answer our most obvious idea procedure is traveling to be. how are we traveling to happen the reply?
He points out that at this minute people are already believing of keywords for seeking in the Internet the reply. Third. “Not utilizing Google makes you stupid. excessively. ” Clark uses the same survey from UCLA done in 2008 that found that Internet usage increases more encephalon activity that traditional reading. Clark brings an interesting point about multitasking. Harmonizing to his article. he says that harmonizing to scientists. short-run memories while multitasking deteriorates and this is besides related to distractions. reasonably much to the 1s we wind all the clip while seeking in the cyberspace [ 3 ] .
Andrew Sullivan in his article. “ Google is giving us pond-skater heads. ” states the importance and all the benefits of Google. He says that in the yesteryear he used to maintain tonss of documents in order to finish a research or compose an article. Besides. he highlighted the importance of him holding a good memory merely to seek to retrieve where al the relevant information was and that he spent countless and useless clip reading irrelevant information. He says now all he has to make is right-click and type a few words and all the information he wants he can acquire it immediately. Sullivan states that he does 100s of web log stations a hebdomad and that now he is better form than earlier because he is immediately informed.
He besides points out that the manner he thinks has changed. He is able to treat information faster and absorb multiple resources of information at the same time. He besides points out the issue of multitasking in how he gets distracted by all the resources available through the Internet. He says that we might be fring some type of focal point on how we used to read books before but that everything is due to the overpowering resources available to us and that we will finally accommodate and larn to be more efficient with pull stringsing information [ 4 ] .
In decision I think Carr has some valid points in worrying about alterations in our thought procedure. I believe our thought procedure and acquisition procedure is altering for good. I don’t agree in his chief point that Google is non profiting us. I think Google is a illimitable tool that allows us now to happen information quicker and more efficient than traditional book reading methods. I do believe there are some disadvantages that come with on-line research and utilizing search engines like Google. We sometimes let ourselves lose concentration and concentrate while surfing the web. I do it excessively. but in bend we have at our custodies so much research resources and cognition that the benefits outweighs enormously this minor route blocks. I know in the hereafter we are traveling to larn how to utilize on-line resources better and larn how non acquire distracted. At the terminal of the twenty-four hours Google is doing us smarter and better research workers.
1. “What are some of the benefits to utilizing Google Custom Search? ” Home. Stanford University. n. d. Web. 21 June 2014. . 2. Conners. Valerie. “Why does Nicholas Carr think Google is doing us stupid? – Curiosity. ” Curiosity. Discovery. n. d. Web. 21 June 2014. . 3. Clark Estes. Adam. “Google Is Making Us Stupid and Smart at the Same Time? . ” The Wire. The Wire. 15 July 2011. Web. 21 June 2014. . 4. Sullivan. Andre. “Google is giving us pond-skater heads. ” Google is giving us pond-skater heads. Times Online. 15 June 2008. Web. 21 June 2014. .