Differences In Continental And Common Law Legal Systems Law Essay

Law and Legal Systems have ever been an of import portion of every society, furthermore, they help us take attention of struggles, punish persons who violate the jurisprudence, and work out jobs. Our society can non get by with people behavior, force and unstoppable desire to hold whatever, whenever and wherever. In this instance, John Locke said that all people are barbarous and they need superior entity to command them and that is why he offered to make a contract called societal contract to acquire peace because society demand statute law, nevertheless that was non ideal contract, it was unwritten. Therefore, we need to look deeper into jurisprudence in general, its history and all subdivisions which it includes. Obviously, I should advert general definition of jurisprudence which is a system of general regulations which are stated by authorities and accepted by all people to modulate their behaviour and people should obey and follow these regulations to protect themselves.[ 1 ]

As our president Islam Karimov said “ There is no hereafter without cognizing history ” . Consequently, we need to cognize at least general information about history, non merely, in footings of developing Law and Legal systems, but besides in every facets of our life, to be able to separate difference between subdivisions of jurisprudence. There are three major legal systems in the universe which is Civil jurisprudence, Common jurisprudence and Religious jurisprudence.

Park and Continental jurisprudence legal system

Civil jurisprudence, besides known as Continental European jurisprudence, nowadays is profoundly used in European and Latin American states and elsewhere. However, to understand Civil jurisprudence legal system better, we need to get down in antiquity, as Civil Law has its cellar in Rome. Harmonizing to the book “ A primer on the Civil jurisprudence system ” , in ancient Roman legal system, they had individuals called Jurists, they were non merely, Judgess, but besides, individuals who “ learned in the jurisprudence ” or in other words, legal experts. Their ulterior written plants made cardinal parts to the development of the Roman legal system and had an of import influence on history. History of Civil jurisprudence is really rich and to understand in deepness modern civil jurisprudence, likely need to look into history from the Roman Empire to the recent yearss.

Continental jurisprudence attempts to work out non-criminal instances, divorce, kid detention, belongings ownership, harm of belongings, etc. The chief characteristic in Continental Law is that Torahs are written into a aggregation, codified, and non determined as in common jurisprudence, by Judgess. ( Wikipedia, Civil jurisprudence ( legal system ) , 10 March 2010 )

ALSO READ  What are the Pitfalls for a Producer who does not Consider the Legal Implications of the Narrative Content in their Film?

Common jurisprudence is used in England and in states colonized by England. The common jurisprudence was a merchandise of three English courts- King ‘s Bench, Exchequer, and the Court of Common Pleas ; moreover they created a typical organic structure of philosophy.[ 2 ]The typical feature of Common jurisprudence is that it reflects the jurisprudence of the tribunals as expressed in judicial determinations. The justice makes determinations in case in point provided by old determinations, in comparing to the civil jurisprudence legal system, which is based on legislative acts and prescribed texts. The other characteristic of common jurisprudence is a test with engagement of jury and the philosophy of the domination of the jurisprudence. ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www.infoplease.com/ce6/society/A0857483.html, March 14, 2010 )

Therefore, the chief difference between Civil and Common jurisprudence is beginnings of jurisprudence. In other words, on the footing of common jurisprudence is instance which means all determinations are made by Judgess on a instance by instance footing. And civil jurisprudence system uses codified organic structure of general rules which control the exercising of judicial discretion and applied to all instances such as legislative act or fundamental law. One more difference between Continental and Common jurisprudence is that, one of them uses adversarial system and the other-inquisitorial. So, we can find inquisitorial system as a legal system in which the tribunal is proactively involved in specifying the facts of the instance. Therefore, this is the difference of inquisitorial system from adversarial where the defense mechanism and prosecution are moving independently to present their instance.[ 3 ]

Private and Public jurisprudence

Civil jurisprudence is divided into two subdivisions, Private jurisprudence and Public jurisprudence. So, private jurisprudence is concerned with the rights and responsibilities of persons towards each other.[ 4 ]Private jurisprudence trades with Civil jurisprudence, Contracts, Labour Law, Corporations, Family jurisprudence, etc. Persons who are holding trade with Private jurisprudence, can be either physical individual or legal entity[ 5 ]. However, sometimes, Labour jurisprudence, societal security and other assorted subjects could be referred as “ assorted ” public and private countries.

Public jurisprudence, on the other manus, solves jobs between governmental organic structures or between authorities and physical individual or legal entity. This involves dealingss between private citizens or organisations and the authorities, therefore which means Public jurisprudence trades with Criminal jurisprudence, Constitutional jurisprudence, Administrative jurisprudence and Taxation. So, this is the chief difference between Public and Private jurisprudence that Public jurisprudence concerns with the jobs between authorities and persons whereas Private jurisprudence concerns with instances persons between persons.

ALSO READ  Law Essay – International Law

Civil and Criminal processs

Why do we necessitate processs? A procedural system helps use substantial jurisprudence to existent differences and a good procedural system gives counsel to information which is received by justice or jury. Furthermore, it helps to show this information in an appropriate manner and so on. In other words, good process makes certain that similar instances will be treated likewise, by the tribunal.[ 6 ]Civil process consists of the regulations by which tribunals conduct civil tests ( hypertext transfer protocol: //topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/civil_procedure, 2010 ) . Besides, we need to separate substantial jurisprudence from process itself, which includes contract jurisprudence, civil wrong jurisprudence, etc. So, substantial jurisprudence determines the rights and responsibilities of mundane behavior. So, civil process, by and large deals with non condemnable instances which means instances ended with paying all right by one party to the other. Other civil redresss include damages or transportation of belongings, or an injunction to keep or order certain actions[ 7 ]. Besides, civil process concerns relationships between two or more people who can be physical individuals, legal entity or authorities. This may be considered as the chief difference between Civil and Criminal process, because condemnable process takes an action between State and persons. The penalty for perpetrating offense could be paying all right, probation or incarcerating to gaol, because it is of import for authorities to protect peaceable life of their people. The usual condemnable procedure in civil jurisprudence system divided into three chief stages: probe, scrutiny and the test. At probe phase public prosecuting officer collects grounds and decides whether it is dependable or non. Typically, analyzing stage is composing portion where justice look into all written records and decides whether should this peculiar instance goes to test. At the test phase suspect can be questioned. Due to analyzing stage, test itself differs vastly from a common jurisprudence condemnable process, likely because the record is already taken and every bit available to both prosecuting officer and suspect before the test.[ 8 ]

Decision

To sum up, I want to state that it is truly of import to distinguish jurisprudence and its subdivisions because they differ from each other with their beginnings, continuing systems, etc. We should understand that jurisprudence is a immense scientific discipline and has a batch of beginnings which are every bit of import as jurisprudence itself. For illustration, three chief jurisprudence legal systems- Common, Civil and Religious legal systems. Civil jurisprudence itself besides have branches- Private and Public jurisprudence, while into these systems, there are besides other sub systems such as adversarial and inquisitorial systems. So, taking everything into consideration, I can reason that people all over the universe demand jurisprudence, i.e. supreme State which would command people ‘s behaviour and maintain peace in the state.

ALSO READ  Equity, Common Law Courts & Court of Chancery

Bibliography

Common jurisprudence and Civil jurisprudence systems: Judges and jurisprudence, the differences between Common and Civil jurisprudence systems [ Internet ] , Common jurisprudence and Civil jurisprudence systems. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //openlearn.open.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php? id=208934 [ Accessed 13 March 2010 ] .

Common jurisprudence: Characteristic characteristics of Common jurisprudence [ Internet ] , Common jurisprudence. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.infoplease.com/ce6/society/A0857483.html [ Accessed 14 March 2010 ] .

Laval, K. ( 2007 ) Legal systems: Common jurisprudence vs. Civil jurisprudence [ Internet ] , Legal systems. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //lgsg.wetpaint.com/page/Legal+Systems: +Common+Law+vs+Civil+Law [ Accessed 14 March 2010 ] .

Civicss library ( 2006 ) What is civil jurisprudence [ Internet ] , what is civil jurisprudence. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //members.mobar.org/civics/WhatisCivilLaw.htm [ Accessed 10 March 2010 ] .

Wikipedia ( 2009 ) Civil Law [ Internet ] , Civil jurisprudence. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_law_ ( country ) [ Accessed 9 March 2010 ] .

Free Advice ( 2010 ) Civil jurisprudence suits [ Internet ] , Civil jurisprudence suits. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //law.freeadvice.com/litigation/civil_law_suits/civil_procedure_criminal.htm [ Accessed 15 March 2010 ] .

Legal Information Institute, Civil process [ Internet ] , civil process. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/civil_procedure [ Accessed 15 March 2010 ] .

Wikipedia ( 2010 ) Civil process [ Internet ] , civil process. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_procedure [ Accessed 14 March 2010 ] .

Apple, J.G. and Deyling, R.P. , A primer on the Civil-law system: the history and development of civil jurisprudence [ Internet ] , the history and development of civil jurisprudence. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.google.co.uz/url? sa=t & A ; source=web & A ; ct=res & A ; cd=3 & A ; ved=0CBsQFjAC & A ; url=http % 3A % 2F % 2Fwww.fjc.gov % 2Fpublic % 2Fpdf.nsf % 2Flookup % 2FCivilLaw.pdf % 2F % 24file % 2FCivilLaw.pdf & A ; rct=j & A ; q=civil+law+system & A ; ei=WLycS_yjCM_14AaL_sB2 & A ; usg=AFQjCNENtPYqke3xlDh — _c1n4mz3E7fpw [ Accessed 10 March 2010 ] .

Apple, J.G. and Deyling, R.P. , A primer on the Civil-law system: The legal procedure [ Internet ] , the legal procedure. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.google.co.uz/url? sa=t & A ; source=web & A ; ct=res & A ; cd=3 & A ; ved=0CBsQFjAC & A ; url=http % 3A % 2F % 2Fwww.fjc.gov % 2Fpublic % 2Fpdf.nsf % 2Flookup % 2FCivilLaw.pdf % 2F % 24file % 2FCivilLaw.pdf & A ; rct=j & A ; q=civil+law+system & A ; ei=WLycS_yjCM_14AaL_sB2 & A ; usg=AFQjCNENtPYqke3xlDh — _c1n4mz3E7fpw [ Accessed 11 March 2010 ] .

Law essays UK: Inquisitorial and Adversarial systems [ Internet ] , Inquisitorial and adversarial systems. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.law-essays-uk.com/free-essays/inquisitorial-system-of-criminal-justice.php [ Accessed 17 March, 2010 ] .

Wikipedia ( 2010 ) Inquisitorial system [ Internet ] , Inquisitorial system. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisitorial_system [ Accessed 17 March, 2010 ] .

Hazelbaker, J. ( 2010 ) US Law and Justice: Difference between Common jurisprudence and Civil jurisprudence [ Internet ] , Difference between Common jurisprudence and Civil jurisprudence. Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.helium.com/items/220070-differences-between-common-law-and-civil-law [ Accessed 17 March, 2010 ] .