The manner we see ourselves has changed dramatically over the old ages in this state. This is. in big portion. because of our drawn-out exposure to media in all its signifiers. We have held a uninterrupted treatment on this really subject in my Communications & A ; Rhetoric category for hebdomads now. and we still haven’t even scratched the surface. From a immature age. we are shown precisely what “attractive” should look like. and while we are given illustrations for both sexes. these messages are preponderantly geared towards immature misss. While some misss may hold the ability to merely disregard them. many others take these thoughts to bosom and are well affected by them. That’s where the theory of the looking glass ego comes in.
The looking glass ego theory provinces that the position of ourselves comes from the scrutiny of personal qualities and feelings of how others identify us. How we see ourselves does non come from whom we truly are. but instead from how we believe others see us. So if we grow up taking these messages from the media earnestly. it can be highly damaging to our self-image. sing most of us don’t look like the people in magazines and on telecasting. The construct of the looking glass ego helps us understand non merely our ain thought. but besides how we form our individuality based on how others see us. Equally long as we are interacting with others. we are susceptible to altering our ain self-image. a procedure that will go on throughout our lives.
Images in the media today give us an unrealistic and even unsafe criterion of feminine beauty that can hold a powerful impact on the manner adult females view themselves. From the point of view of the mass media. narrow margin is overemphasized and expected for adult females to be considered “attractive” . The media is filled with images of females who satisfy these unrealistic criterions. doing it look as if it is normal for adult females to populate up to them. Helga Dittmar. a societal psychologist. had this to state sing the popularity of unrealistic media images: “Ultra-thin theoretical accounts are so outstanding that exposure to them becomes ineluctable and ‘chronic’ . invariably reenforcing a disagreement for most adult females and misss between their existent size and the ideal body” . Basically. many media mercantile establishments are indirectly ( or straight. in some instances ) stating immature adult females what they should look like. By making this. they emphasize the differences between these immature women’s organic structures and the “ideal” organic structure. which. harmonizing to the looking glass theory. would be kind of like stating them straight that they don’t look good plenty.
These messages are so influential and common in our civilization that they affect misss long before they are exposed to manner or beauty ads or magazines: “Three-year-olds already prefer game pieces that portray thin people over those stand foring heavier 1s. while by age seven misss are able to separate something they would wish to alter about their appearance” . These attitudes merely acquire more powerful as misss get older. In one study. about half of nine to twelve-year-old misss said they wanted to be dilutant and had either been on a diet or were cognizant of the thought of dieting.
Surveies have often shown that changeless attending to thin theoretical accounts encourages organic structure image anxiousnesss and disordered eating in many females. Almost all signifiers of media contain unlikely images. and the negative effects of these word pictures have been proven in assorted surveies. Deborah Schooler. an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Gallaudet University. found that adult females who reported more exposure to telecasting programming during their young person were prone to see higher degrees of organic structure image jobs than females who said they didn’t watch as much telecasting. Certain types of programming seem to arouse higher degrees of letdown in their organic structures as good. Marika Tiggemann. a professor of psychological science at Flinders University. found that adult females who viewed music picture that showed thin theoretical accounts experienced higher degrees of negative temper and were noticed holding more body image jobs. Music picture seem to direct a message that adult females should populate up to the sociocultural ideal ; adult females pictured are about ever expressed symbols of what our civilization considers “attractive” .
Once these thoughts and messages for the ideal organic structure type are ingrained into the heads of immature grownups. many take it upon themselves to hassle equals who aren’t every bit “attractive” as they realize they are ( All of this harmonizing to a criterion set by media ) . As people around us pass judgement on who they believe we are as worlds. this is when our self-concept develops. Self-concept is fundamentally who we think we are and how we feel approximately ourselves as a whole. These judgements by others can hold powerful effects on how people see themselves.
The mass media’s description of adult females depicts a criterion of attraction that is unattainable for most adult females in society. Models presented in all signifiers of standard media are frequently under what is known to be healthy organic structure weight. which sends an influential message that adult females must develop unhealthy ( or ultra-healthy ) wonts to be considered beautiful by societal criterions. The destructive effects of excessively thin media images of adult females have been good recognized. Surveies have shown that females who adopt the thought that being thin is more beautiful are at higher hazard to develop eating upsets. Though it is clear that media affects the manner adult females see themselves. it is open how this specifically happens. The societal comparing theory can be used to detect how media images of adult females come to upset the manner adult females feel about their organic structures and visual aspect. These point of views besides give some justification for why some adult females are able to disregard the negative results of media. while others are perceptibly impacted.
Isaksen. Joachim Vogt. “The Looking Glass Self: How Our Self-image Is Shaped by Society. ” POPULAR SOCIAL SCIENCE. Popular Social Science. 27 May 2013. Web. 08 Oct. 2014.
Desai. Vidhi. “Looking-Glass Self: Theory. Definition & A ; Examples. ” Education Portal. n. d. Web. 09 Oct. 2014.
Johnson. Bethany. “Charles Horton Cooley: Looking Glass Self and the Effect of Primary Groups. ” Education Portal. n. d. Web. 09 Oct. 2014.
Mendoza. Stephanie. “Communication Theory. ” Â» Has the Media’s Perception of
Beauty Changed Us? Longwood University. 11 Jan. 2014. Web. 11 Oct. 2014.
“The Media And Body Image. ” RSS 20. Mirror Mirror. n. d. Web. 11 Oct. 2014. .
Mascarelli. Amanda Leigh. “Search Content. ” Student Science. N. p. . 19 Sept. 2014. Web. 11 Oct. 2014. .