The author of the article on hypertext transfer protocol: //www. buzzle. com/articles/argument-against-animal-testing. html provinces that: Experiments on life animate beings are taking medical specialty further and further from the existent remedy Because animate beings react to both diseases and medicines otherwise from worlds they should non be used Animal research has non aided in the battle against any major disease There is no connexion between animate being testing and human wellness A wholly new attack is needed alternatively of carnal proving
Experiments on animate beings are taking medical specialty further and further from the existent remedy The author begins his article with a quotation mark in which it is stated that carnal proving brings worlds farther off from the truth. The quotation mark besides points out that the author does non cognize of an case in which medical scientific discipline ( and animal proving ) has helped salvage human lives. I. nevertheless. revenge against such a remark because both medical scientific discipline and animate being testing have brought about a batch for us worlds. For illustration. if it weren’t for carnal testing. penicillin and aesthetics would non hold come about. Besides. without medical scientific discipline most of today’s medicines would non be.
Animals should non be used because they react otherwise to substances than worlds do The author states that “Not merely do animate beings respond otherwise from worlds where drugs. experiments and vaccinums are concerned. but they besides tend to respond otherwise from each other. ” He besides says that disregarding these differences will be really dearly-won to worlds. Even though he puts frontward this statement really efficaciously I do non hold with this point because. -as stated in many articles- for the bulk of experiments. mice. -which portion 99 % of their cistrons with humans- are used. With the coming of familial technology engineering. genetically modified mice can be generated to order and can supply theoretical accounts for a scope of human diseases. Mice are besides used in topographic point of other animate beings because they reproduce rapidly and are inexpensive to keep. therefore merely minimum harm is done Furthermore. most states have a jurisprudence which states that a medical specialty must be administered to at least two big animate beings such as Canis familiariss before worlds can utilize it.
Animal research has non aided in the battle against any major disease The author states that “animal research has non aided in the battle against any of the major diseases” such as malignant neoplastic disease. He besides states that animate being research has non helped in the battle against AIDS because animate beings can non develop the human signifier of AIDS. Even though this point is true I do non hold with it because even though animate beings do non develop the human signifier of AIDS they do develop their ain type of AIDS. For illustration. monkeys are capable of developing SIV or SHIV. Because these viruses react in similar ways to the human signifier of AIDS. scientists conduct their experiments on the monkeys and detect how the monkeys react to different medicines. These finds can so be applied to worlds in similar ways because the SIV/SHIV virus is similar to the human signifier of the HIV virus. Overall. this method is much better than carry oning HIV experiments on worlds.
There is no connexion between animate being testing and the human wellness The author states that there is no ( general ) connexion between animate being testing and human wellness. I. nevertheless. make non hold with this point because at an earlier point in the article. the author states that there are scientific virtues to animal proving. he besides states that insulin was discovered merely through carnal testing. Therefore. the author can be seen to belie himself. This shows that that the author is unsure and that he does non to the full hold with his ain point. Options to animal testing should be used
The author states that if any progress is to be made. a wholly new attack is required. He states that human medical specialty should non be dependent on veternary medical specialty because it is unsafe and deceitful to use informations from one species to another. different species. Although this point is true. I can non hold with it because there is no option to animal proving which is as good and efficient as carnal proving. Furthermore. the author fails to name any options which he thinks is acceptable. This can be due to him non believing in an alternate. or it can be due to weak beliefs or inadecuate research.