Kunda ( 1999 ) noted that people have a inclination when they perceive others in societal scenes. to automatically categorise them into three major dimensions: race. age and sex ( as cited in Nelson. 2004. p. nine ) . Barrow and Smith ( 1979 ) noted that merely a little proportion of theoretical and empirical research within psychological science has been directed towards understanding agism ( while much of the research has focused on the other two ‘isms’ : racism and sexism ) ( as cited in Nelson. 2004. p. nine ) . Butler ( 1969 ) coined the term ‘ageism’ depicting it as being comparative to other illustrations of dogmatism ( e. g. sexism and racism ) whereby he defined it as people consistently pigeonholing and know aparting others on the footing that they are old ( as cited in Angus & A ; Reeve. 2006 ) .
Nowadays. the construct is more slackly defined as one know aparting against or being damaging ( in a positive or negative mode ) towards any age class ( Angus & A ; Reeve. 2006 ) . Discrimination may be defined as a set of procedures which leads to another person or group being marginalized ( Thompson. 2005. p. 3 ) . While bias may be defined as one holding a negative attitude about other people because of the group they are a member of ( Holt et al. . 2012. p. 539 ) .
One possible ground for why there has non been much attending paid to agism is the fact that showing age bias is likely one of the most socially common. unmarked and institutionalised types of bias found globally – particularly in the United States ( Nelson. 2004. p. nine ) . For e. g. think back to the last clip you bought a birthday card for a friend/family member who was over the age of 50 which implied some kind of metal or physical diminution or had an “over the hill” subject despite being done in a purportedly humourous manner ( Thompson. 2005. p. 16 ; Nelson. 2004. p. nine ) . Since research into agism is thin and that it is a common signifier a societal bias. this essay will take to place the causes and effects of agism every bit good as seting frontward some recommendations which could assist to better this “ism” . The Causes of Ageism
One interesting and specifying feature of agism. is that age. unlike sex and race. signifies a class in which immature people will most likely grow old ( provided they do non decease at a immature age ) ( Nelson. 2004. p. ten ) . As a consequence. it seems quiet strange that immature people would show bias towards those who they themselves will finally go like ( Nelson. 2004. p. ten ) . A figure of accounts as to what causes agism have been put frontward and we will look at the undermentioned three: stereotypes. panic direction theory and societal individuality theory. Stereotypes
Harding. Proshansky. Kutner. and Chein ( 1969. p. 4 ) defined a stereotype as being “a belief that is simple. inadequately grounded. at least partly inaccurate. and held with considerable confidence by many people” ( as cited in MacKie. 1973. p. 432 ) . We use stereotypes as cognitive constructions to keep our outlooks and beliefs sing the features of persons belonging to different societal groups and whether or non they are accurate. our stereotypes act upon our societal behavior ( Nelson. 2004. p. 4 ) . The stereotypes which have been established sing agism have become so deep-rooted in the perceptual experiences we have about human life that they have now become undisputed beliefs ( Angus & A ; Reeve. 2006 ) .
Whenever you see people. you categorize these persons into race. age and sex ( Nelson. 2005 ) . We have learned to categorise people really good and it has become a polar facet to our societal perceptual experience ( Nelson. 2005 ) . Classification can take to pigeonholing and as Ormrod ( 2000 ) stipulated. stereotypes have three specifying features: they are simple. stiff and inaccurate ( Nelson. 2005 ; as cited in Bowd. 2003 ) .
Hummert ( 1990 ) recruited 80 undergraduate pupils in order to place positive and negative stereotypes associated with the aged. Following cluster analysis of the informations Hummert ( 1990 ) identified two high-ranking bunchs. one incorporating 31 positive stereotypes and the other incorporating 57 negative stereotypes. Some of the negative stereotypes included unable to manage a occupation. demanding. useless. raging. easy disquieted. unable to pass on and a load to society while some positive stereotypes included understanding. interesting. happy. household orientated and wise ( Hummert. 1990 ) . Snyder and Miene ( 1994 ) proposed that stereotypes of the aged act as a signifier of ego-protection. proposing that the negative facets of ageist pigeonholing allows the single utilizing that stereotype to distance themselves from the older group which later facilitates the belief that the immature and middle-aged persons in society are the prevailing group ( as cited in Bowd. 2003 ) .
Angus ( 2000 ) mentioned that negative stereotypes of the aged can undersell an aged person’s belief that they can still be autonomous ( as cited in Angus & A ; Reeve. 2006 ) . For e. g. Seale ( 1996 ) analysed the histories given by 163 relations. friends and others who knew aged persons populating entirely. independently during the concluding 12 months of their lives and found that older people resisted aid from neighbors and friends as a manner to guarantee that they would non be forced into a nursing place which would do them to lose their sense of independency. Seale ( 1996 ) concluded from the narrations provided by aged persons populating entirely. that when their physical abilities began to worsen this lead to a feeling that they were losing control of their lives and signified the beginning of a societal decease. When we maintain attitudes towards the aged which are regarded as positive this does non forestall us from for e. g. prosecuting with them in a mode that is mediated by the negative stereotypes that exist about the aged ( Nelson. 2005 ) .
One signifier of battle with the aged by younger persons is known as overaccomodation ( Nelson. 2005 ) . Giles. Fox. Harwood. and Williams ( 1994 ) explained that with overaccomodation younger grownups communicate with aged people through talking more easy and aloud. usage simplified linguistic communication or avoid words that have more than two or three syllables while Grainger. Atkinson. and Coupland ( 1990 ) said that overaccomodtion can ensue in the downplaying of feelings. ideas and concerns that older people express ( as cited in Nelson. 2005 ) . Terror Management Theory
Another possible account for what causes agism is the Terror Management Theory ( TMT ) . This theory. which has its foundations in the Hagiographas of Becker ( 1971 ; 1973 ; 1975 ) maintains that as worlds our desire to last. alongside our consciousness that we will finally yield to the inexorable harvester. causes the potency for us to experience dying and so we must keep control over this anxiousness ( Martens. Goldenberg. & A ; Greenberg. 2005 ) . Harmonizing to the TMT. as worlds we have developed a psychological anxiousness defense mechanism mechanism which is composed of self-pride and a cultural worldview ( CWV ) and this mechanism helps us get by with our unconscious cognition that our decease is impending ( Bodner. 2009 ) .
A CWV refers to a shared perceptual experience of world which provides stableness. significance. permanency. order and a symbolic or actual ageless life ( e. g. our lives continue through our kids or belief in an hereafter ) to those who maintain the criterions of value imposed by the civilization they belong to ( Bodner. 2009 ) . Self-esteem refers to one’s premise that they are keeping the criterions of value which are set out by the CWV ( Bodner. 2009 ) . Together the CWV and self-esteem guarantee that people are priceless members in the universe and this helps them protect themselves from their frights of deceasing ( Bodner. 2009 ) .
Martens et Al. ( 2005 ) utilizing the TMT. identified three psychological menaces which help to account for individual’s negative reactions towards the aged. The first is the Menace of Death – When immature people see older people. older people remind them that they can non outrun the inevitable terminal – which is to turn old and dice ( supplying that one is non killed in a auto accident. by a disease. at the custodies of another etc. i. e. supplying we do non decease before our clip ) ( Martens et al. . 2005 ) . As a consequence. from this point of position. aged people may be the most powerful reminder that as worlds we are but mortal existences ( Martens et al. . 2005 ) The 2nd is the Menace of Animality – This menace is less associated with decease itself. instead it indicates that the physical organic structure doubtless becomes fallible with age ( Martens et al. . 2005 ) . As we age. it may happen that we have less control over our bodily maps. which as younger persons we try to guarantee that these maps are kept discreet ( Martens et al. . 2005 ) .
To younger people. the aged non merely remind us that we will decease. but due to their worsening physical organic structures. they remind us of our physical and animalistic nature ( Martens et al. . 2005 ) . The 3rd is the Menace of Insignificance – The aged remind the immature about the possibility that one twenty-four hours they may be striped of the sense of value that they possess now. Older people may arouse fright in the immature. if they witness the aged lose the manner ( s ) in which one maintains their symbolic sense of dignity ( for e. g. your profession which you may lose during subsequently life because of forced/early retirement or because there has been a diminution in one’s working abilities ) ( Martens et al. . 2005 ) . This sense of dignity is a chief subscriber to protecting ourselves from the frights that arise from cognizing that we are non immortal ( Martens et al. . 2005 ) .
Martens. Greenberg. Schimel. and Landau ( 2004 ) conducted a survey in order to place whether the hypothesis that older people serve as a reminder of our mortality. in which concerns about mortality can give rise to agism by younger people towards older people. 96 pupils from an introductory psychological science category were recruited ( with an mean age of 18. 65 old ages ) and divided into two groups: one group ( the decease group ) wrote a short narrative detailing the emotions and ideas they had when they thought about deceasing while the 2nd group ( the control group ) besides wrote a short narrative. this clip non about their deceases but instead the uncomfortable experience of holding a tooth aching ( Martens et al. . 2004 ) . Both groups were asked to rate how good 16 statements about assorted behaviors ( e. g. I’m a really friendly individual ) were believed to be desirable ( Martens et al. . 2004 ) . Martens et Al. ( 2004 ) found that those who were in the decease group accredited a larger sum of statements which portrayed unwanted behaviors. to older people. than participants who were in the control group. Social Identity Theory
The 3rd possible account for agism is the Social Identity Theory ( SIT ) . The basic thought of the SIT is that the societal class a individual falls into ( e. g. ethnicity. nationality. athleticss squad etc. ) and believes that they belong to. contributes to how they define themselves within the kingdom of their self-concept ( Hogg. Terry & A ; White. 1995 ) . A person’s self-concept ( i. e. your sense of who you are ) consists of both a personal individuality ( i. e. one’s consciousness of one’s ain personal attitudes and features ) and a societal individuality ( Myers. 2009. p. 326 ) . Within the SIT: ( 1 ) we categorize – we find it helpful to put others every bit good as ourselves into classs ( 2 ) we identify – we classify ourselves with peculiar groups ( called the “in-group” ) which enhances our self-esteem. because the feeling of “we-ness” which comes from belonging to an in-group aid to beef up our self-concept and ( 3 ) we compare – we analyse our group ( in-group ) with groups to which we are non a member ( the ‘out-group’ ) and in making so we demonstrate a favorable prejudice to our ain group ( Myers. 2009. p. 326 ) .
How we identify ourselves socially can do us to conform to the thoughts and norms of the group we belong to ( Myers. 2010. p. 326 ) . The sum of importance we place on our societal individuality and the strength to which we attach ourselves to our in-group mediates how strongly we will prejudicially respond to comprehend menaces from another group/out-group ( Myers. 2009. p. 326 ) . Butler ( 1975 ; 2009 ) proposed that the SIT implies that agism facilitates younger persons to travel off and keep a distance from older persons whereby this may take to the younger people really subtly neglecting to place aged people as human existences ( as cited in Bodner. 2009 ) . Bodner and Lazar ( 2008 ) demonstrated that for the most portion. negative attitudes sing older people are held by younger grownups. The writers administered the Fraboni Scale of Ageism ( Fraboni. Saltstone. & A ; Hughes. 1990 ) to a convenience sample of 491 participants. aged between 17. 5-45. 5 old ages. recruited from a figure of universities in Israel in order to place if the findings from the construction of agism surveies conducted in the United States ( an individualistic population ) could be generalized to people who live in a more collectivized society. like Israel ( Bodner & A ; Lazar. 2008 ) .
The consequences from the survey provided a three-factor construction of agism and was really similar to those found elsewhere. whereby the three factors identified were: ( 1 ) Avoidance – high spots one’s inclination to avoid contact with the aged and was similar to both the separation factor identified by Rupp. Vodanovich. and Crede ( 2005 ) and the turning away factor identified by Fraboni et Al. ( 1990 ) ( 2 ) Contribution –reflects the negative position that younger grownups have sing the parts of the aged to society. which was similar to the affectional attitude factor described by Rupp et Al. ( 2005 ) and the favoritism factor identified by Fraboni et Al. ( 1990 ) and ( 3 ) Stereotype – reflects the figure of negative stereotypes younger grownups have towards the aged. which was practically the same as the stereotype factor demonstrated by Rupp et Al. ( 2005 ) and the antilocution factor identified by Fraboni et Al. ( 1990 ) . The Consequences of Ageism
There a figure of effects that can bechance those who have experienced agism. For e. g. older peoples self-esteem may endure due to the feeling that they have a reduced sense of value ( Kane. 2004 ) . They may see infantilization ( i. e. being treated as if they were babies ) which Arluke and Levin ( 1984 ) said leads to the development of a self-fulfilling prognostication whereby older people begin to believe that they can no longer lend to and populate independently in society and so follow a dependant and inactive function ( as cited in Nelson. 2005 ) . Grant ( 1996 ) competently noted that when the aged Begin to believe the stereotypes and age myths associated with them and therefore act harmonizing to them ; this bolsters the care of such stereotypes and the subsequent behavior which is directed towards them ( as cited in Nelson. 2005 ) . The effects of agism in the work topographic point and wellness attention services will be discussed. Consequences of Ageism in the Workplace
Williams and Nussbaum ( 2001 ) proposed that by the twelvemonth 2020. 39. 1 % of those working will be over the age of 55 old ages while McCann and Giles ( 2002 ) said that alongside this there is an addition in the figure of age-discrimination cases being filed whereby the pay-outs in such cases was about $ 219. 000 between 1988 and 1995 and more late pay-outs ranged from $ 6. 2 million to $ 58. 8 million ( as cited in Rupp. Vodanovich. & A ; Crede. 2006 ) . Hassell and Perrewe ( 1995 ) and Kite and Wagner ( 2002 ) said that these colony figures exceed colony figures offered in sexism and racism cases ( as cited in Rupp et Al. . 2006 ) . Discrimination against older members in the workplace may happen because those who discriminate believe that as you age your work public presentation ability decreases ( e. g. Faley. Kleiman. & A ; Lengnick-Hall. 1984 ; Issacharoff & A ; Harris. 1997 ) nevertheless Cleveland and Landy ( 1983 ) said that so far the chronological age of persons has non yet been found to move as a forecaster of public presentation for any peculiar person in any given occupation type ( Rupp et al. . 2006 ) .
Laczko and Philipson ( 1991 ) identified that older persons are frequently reported as holding lower public presentation tonss in malice of the fact that older workers have high degrees of flexibleness. willingness to larn and energy and are every bit productive as younger employees ( as cited in Rupp et Al. . 2006 ) . Segrave ( 2001 ) identified that older workers are less prone to turnover. are more reliable and are more productive than younger workers ( as cited in Rupp et Al. . 2006 ) . Segrave ( 2001 ) found that from a sample of organisations which entirely employed persons who were aged at least 50 old ages. these organisations experienced 60 % less inventory loss. 16 % less turnover. 40 % less absenteeism and had 18 % higher net incomes. compared to similar organisations which employed younger persons ( as cited in Rupp et Al. . 2006 ) . Older people can be as or more productive in the work force than their younger opposite numbers. and so it makes one admiration in what ways are older employees or possible older employees discriminated against.
Take for e. g. a survey carried out by Bendick. Jnr. . Brown and Wall ( 1999 ) which used braces of examiners. one aged 57 old ages and the other aged 32 old ages. who applied for 102 entry-level direction or gross revenues occupations in Washington. DC. Bendick. Jnr. et Al. ( 1999 ) found that: ( 1 ) appliers who were older had an advantage over their younger opposite numbers 1 % of the clip compared to younger appliers who received an advantage over the older appliers 42. 2 % of the clip ( 2 ) those who were older when using for a occupation were treated otherwise ( in a negative manner ) to younger appliers. For e. g. one older applier using for a occupation tried to do contact with the employer four times. go forthing a telephone message three times and facsimiling a transcript of their CV one time but ne’er spoke to anyone straight.
One twenty-four hours after the older applier made their first effort at contact ; the younger applicant telephoned and was provided with the name of the director supervising the hiring procedure. That same twenty-four hours. the director contacted the younger applier to form an interview. At the terminal of the interview. the director offered the younger applicant the occupation and ( 3 ) identified negative stereotypes associated with older employees held by employers including: absence of motive. stiff. limited in their physical capablenesss. deficiency of energy. and technological obsolescence.
Consequences of Ageism in the Health Care Service
It may be sensible to presume that of all people who would be the least likely to pigeonhole and be damaging towards older people ; it would be those whose occupation it is to assist others ( Nelson. 2005 ) . Unfortunately. this is non the instance as those who work as wellness attention professionals are merely every bit likely to be damaging against the aged as anyone else ( Nelson. 2005 ) . Many doctors may keep a negative or stereotyped position of aged patients mediated by a mixture of general cultural prejudices or the fact that more frequently than non older patients tend to stay for longer periods of clip in infirmary and hence utilize more resources than younger patients ( Reyes-Ortiz. 1997 ) . Physicians may keep several ageist attitudes towards aged patients. for e. g. ( 1 ) they may experience that these patients are “untreatable. ” or “senile. ” ( 2 ) may go defeated when they have to cover with the cognitive and/or physical restrictions of older patients or ( 3 ) believe intervention is unpointed ( Reyes-Ortiz. 1997. p. 831 ) .
The attitudes which Reyes-Ortiz ( 1997 ) elucidated to appears apparent in a survey carried out by Minichiello. Browne. and Kendig ( 2000 ) who qualitatively examined what agism meant and how it was experienced by older Australians. The participants highlighted several negative experiences they had with wellness attention professionals including being neglected or treated as if they were non of import. they were non sufficiently informed as to why certain medical trials were being carried out or experiencing like they had lost their liberty when physicians did non confer with them about of import determinations that were being made with regard to their intervention or wellness ( Minichiello et al. . 2000 ) . The undermentioned two infusions highlight some of the negative experiences: “My hubby had a really high sugar evaluation. and the physician said he’d have to travel into infirmary for a couple yearss to hold it brought down…They merely put him in a corner and forgot about him for a hebdomad.
I ever felt that infirmary killed him…They weren’t making anything about his diabetes. But they were doing…other tests…for prostate malignant neoplastic disease and this and that. ” ( Mrs Evans ) ( Minichiello et al. . 2000. p. 271 ) . “The physician was speaking to the charge nurse about nursing places. and I said ‘Excuse me physician. don’t talk about nursing places. you’ve seen me at my worst here’…They weren’t thought of me. He didn’t see me here at place. ” ( Mr Hall ) ( Minichiello et al. . 2000. p. 271 ) . The participants in the survey knew that how they were being treated was incorrect but they believed that for the most portion. they couldn’t alteration or dispute this intervention ( Minichiello et al. . 2000 ) .
Similarly the prejudice that seems apparent with wellness attention doctors besides seems apparent among those who work as mental wellness professionals excessively. Ford and Sbordone ( 1986 ) administered one of two questionnaires to 179 head-shrinkers. which contained four clinical sketchs which were all indistinguishable to each other. except for one factor. age ( as cited in Robb. Chen. & A ; Haley. 2002 ) . The consequences indicated that patients who were younger more normally received encouraging forecasts and were more inclined to be viewed as the “ideal patient” by head-shrinkers compared to older patients ( as cited in Robb et Al. . 2002. p. 5 ) . Ford and Sbordone ( 1986 ) argued that the most likely cause of this was that the head-shrinkers in the survey were exposing damaging attitudes towards older patients ( as cited in Robb et Al. . 2002 ) .
It has been suggested that the prejudice that is observed in those who provide psychological or psychiatric services does non stand for agism but instead indicates healthism ( the stereotypes people hold sing persons who are in a province of hapless physical wellness ) ( Nelson. 2005 ) . James and Haley ( 1995 ) examined wellness prejudice as a different account to agism. as the “barrier-to-treatment” in mental wellness attention proviso. and found that despite the fact that healers still perceived older patients as being less suited for their aid and continued to supply forecasts which were less positive compared to younger patients. the writers found that “healthism” was much more prevalent in the service provided by healers ( as cited in Robb et Al. . 2002. p. 5 ) .
Gatz and Pearson ( 1988 ) suggested that the construct of agism used by the mental wellness service may necessitate some important alteration. as they argued that: ( 1 ) surveies which utilised sketchs did non concentrate on prejudices directed towards older grownups in general. but instead addressed prejudices aimed at peculiar conjectural clients ( 2 ) age in itself is a “weak” stereotype. and that people maintain legion stereotypes of the aged at the same time and ( 3 ) even though certain peculiar prejudices may be directed towards the aged. negative attitudes aimed at the aged does non be on a planetary graduated table ( as cited in Robb et Al. . 2002. p. 5 ) . Taken together. Robb et Al. ( 2002 ) concluded that what had one time been extensively accepted ten old ages ago is now unfastened to guess.
Recommendations for Bettering Ageism
Ageism changes our society and civilization. even if we do non gain this. as it can instil unneeded wretchedness and fright among the older members of our society ( Palmore. 2005 ) . It can be considered a societal disease like sexism and racism but fortunately for us. agism can be reduced through contact. civil suits. amending current statute laws. proviso of personal illustrations of “successful aging” and instruction. which together can assist dispute the negative stereotypes which are associated with agism ( Palmore. 2005. p. 90 ) . We will take a expression at how societal contact and instruction may be used as agencies to better the effects of agism. Social Contact
For decennaries. societal psychologists have been interested in the thought that when persons who are members of the “in-group” ( in this instance younger people ) are in contact with those who belong to the “out-group” ( i. e. aged people ) this can assist alter the in-group members’ attitudes about the out-group members ( Harwood. Hewstone. Paolini & A ; Voci. 2005 ) . Making societal contacts as a younger individual with an older individual can happen within the household context every bit good as other societal contexts ( Bodner. 2009 ) . Harwood et Al. ( 2005 ) demonstrated that when older members of a household maintain durable relationships with the other members ( in peculiar younger members ) so the older members will be viewed more positively and less stereotypically. than older aliens.
It would look that the first measure to assist forestall agism begins within the household since Clavan and Vatter ( 1972 ) noted that when grandparents interact with their grandchildren. this provides them with a opportunity of deriving fondness every bit good as interpersonal satisfaction. while Bengtson and Robertson ( 1985 ) noted that this interaction helps to better grandparents sense of dignity ( as cited in Bodner. 2009 ) . Timberlake ( 1980 ) mentioned a figure of ways in which aged grandparents can profit from interacting with their grandchildren including: ( 1 ) it helps them feel like they are needed or wanted ( 2 ) gives their life stableness and construction ( 3 ) allows them to see new things and ( 4 ) allows them to hold close and physical contact with others ( as cited in Bodner. 2009 ) .
A survey conducted in Norway. utilizing participants aged 40 to 79 old ages. norLAG ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nova. no/subnet/lag/index. htm ) . identified whether or non those with grandchildren were more productive than those who had no grandchildren ( as cited in Hagestad and Uhlenberg. 2006 ) . Out of a entire sample of 5. 600 participants. a smaller subsample consisting of 1. 600 participants aged 60 to 79 old ages were utilized for the intent of the survey. in which 70 % to 80 % of these were both parents and grandparents ( as cited in Hagestad and Uhlenberg. 2006 ) . However. some of the subsample members had neither kids nor grandchildren: for those in their 60’s. 14 % of work forces and 16 % of adult females did non hold children/grandchildren. while those in their 70’s. 11 % of work forces and 18 % of adult females had no children/grandchildren ( as cited in Hagestad and Uhlenberg. 2006 ) .
All of the participants answered questionnaires which contained two points which were used as indexs of societal productiveness: expected more funding for twenty-four hours attention and took portion in voluntary wok whereby it was found that among those who had neither children/grandchildren. these persons were the least likely to volunteer while those who were grandparents took portion in volunteering activities the most and therefore were more productive ( as cited in Hagestad and Uhlenberg. 2006 ) .
It has been suggested that keeping and beef uping household connexions may be a polar first measure towards supplying fondness and developing interpersonal satisfaction in aged people and this can as a consequence aid to relieve the possibility that these persons will be a mark for agism ( Bodner. 2009 ) . Within the kingdom of societal contact. the first topographic point we can look to. to assist forestall agism is in the place and possibly in the hereafter we can travel beyond at that place. Education
The 2nd manner that can assist cut down the happening of agism is to educate people. As we saw earlier wellness attention professions every bit good as policy shapers. faculty members and advocators bring with them to their workplace stereotyped attitudes ( frequently negative ) about older people ( Angus and Reeve. 2006 ) . Stereotypes are retentive and can be hard to change given that the procedures which give rise to the development of such stereotypes tends to get down at a immature age and are normally unconscious ( Henkens. 2005 ) . Angus and Reeve ( 2006 ) suggested that battling agism is non an easy undertaking while Pickering ( 2001 ) proposed that since ageist stereotypes are stiff and play a portion in reenforcing bing power dealingss. taken together this facilitates the care and production of behavioral norms which incite ageist behavior ( as cited in Angus & A ; Reeve. 2006 ) . Despite this Palmore ( 2005 ) noted that instruction is the primary variable that makes a consistent and important difference to tonss obtained from the Facts on Aging Quiz ( a quiz used to mensurate pro-age and anti-age prejudice indirectly ) whereby for the most portion consequences from the quiz favour anti-age prejudice instead than pro-age prejudice.
Peterson. Wendt. and Douglas ( 1994 ) mentioned that higher instruction establishments ( HEI ) during the last two decennaries have acknowledged that geriatrics instruction is really much an country of survey that needs to be expanded ( as cited in Anderson. 1999 ) . Ferraro and Chan ( 1998 ) identified that now more than 500 HEI offer more than 1. 000 geriatrics plans in the United States ( as cited in Anderson. 1999 ) . In malice of this. HEI which offer geriatrics plans still face several challenges ( Anderson. 1999 ) . One challenge is to educate the general populace about the worlds and myths about aging so as to assist cut down ageist behavior ( Anderson. 1999 ) . The general public demand to be informed about how aged persons can and make lend to society every bit good as doing them cognizant of the legion adversities that the aged face ( Anderson. 1999 ) .
Another challenge involves educating non-professionals. proficient staff and paraprofessionals who are responsible for supplying services and plans to the aged since Wendt and Peterson ( 1993 ) noted that many such persons have really small if any preparation in geriatrics while Weaver. Dunn. Ingman. and Lusky ( 1998 ) and Wendt and Peterson ( 1993 ) suggested that those who are officially trained in geriatrics provide much more sensitive. effectual and appropriate attention to the aged ( as cited in Anderson. 1999 ) . This would propose that HEI need to present a non-credit standardised course of study on a full-time footing ( Anderson. 1999 ) .
Ferrario. Freeman. Nellett and Scheel ( 2008 ) followed up a survey carried out by Freeman ( 2003 ) ( who surveyed 117 nursing pupils and found that these pupils held negative attitudes towards the aged ) in order to find if alterations were made to the nursing program’s course of study would this cause changes in nursing students’ attitudes. The alterations made to the course of study. which were hoped would do nursing pupils to keep more positive attitudes towards the aged. before the 2nd set of pupils were surveyed. but which had non been implemented when the first set of 117 nursing pupils were surveyed. included: ( 1 ) larning about the positive factors associated with aging ( 2 ) obtaining experience early in the course of study by working with healthy aged grownups and ( 3 ) deriving clinical experience with both acutely. inveterate and earnestly ill aged grownups and wellness aged grownups populating in the community ( Ferrario et al. . 2008 ) . After amending the nursing course of study. 17 nursing pupils were surveyed whereby this clip the consequences demonstrated that these participants held more positive positions about the aged compared to the first set of pupils ( N=117 ) surveyed. before the course of study alterations ( Ferrario et el. . 2008 ) .
Anderson. T. B. ( 1999 ) . Aging Education in Higher Education: Fixing for the 21st
Century. Educational Gerontology. 25 ( 6 ) . 571-579.
Angus. J. . and Reeve. P. ( 2006 ) . Ageism: A Menace to “Aging Well” in the twenty-first Century.
The Journal of Applied Gerontology. 25 ( 2 ) . 137-152.
Bendick. Jnr. . M. . Brown. L. E. . and Wall. K. ( 1999 ) . No Foot in the Door: An Experimental
Study of Employment Discrimination Against Older Workers. Journal of Aging & A ;
Social Policy. 10 ( 4 ) . 5-23.
Bodner. E. ( 2009 ) . On the beginnings of agism among older and younger grownups. International
Psychogeriatrics. 21 ( 6 ) . 1003-1014.
Bodner. E. . and Lazar. A. ( 2008 ) . Ageism among Israeli pupils: construction and demographic
influences. International Psychogeriatrics. 20 ( 5 ) . 1046-1058. Bowd. A. D. ( 2003 ) . Stereotypes of Elderly Persons in Narrative Jokes. Research on Aging.
25 ( 1 ) . 22-35.
Ferrario. C. G. . Freeman. F. J. . Nellett. G. . and Scheel. J. ( 2008 ) . Changing Nursing Students’
Attitudes about Aging: An Argument for the Successful Aging Paradigm. Educational
Gerontology. 34. 51-66.
Five Stairss to Tyanny ( n. d. ) . Retrieved November 9. 2014. from
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=jk2-ZXAWkfg & A ; channel=Rothschildism Hagestad. G. O. . and Uhlenberg. P. ( 2006 ) . Should We Be Concerned About Age
Segregation? Some Theoretical and Empirical Explorations. Research on Aging.
28 ( 6 ) . 638-653.
Harwood. J. . Hewstone. M. . Paolini. S. . and Voci. A. ( 2005 ) . Grandparent-Grandchild
Contact and Attitudes Towards Older Adults: Moderator and Mediator Effect.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 31 ( 3 ) . 393-406. Henkens. K. ( 2005 ) . Pigeonholing Older Workers and Retirement: The Managers’ Point
of View. Canadian Journal on Aging/ La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement.
24 ( 4 ) . 353-366.
Hogg. M. A. . Terry. D. J. . and White. K. M. ( 1995 ) . A Narrative of Two Theories: A Critical
Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology
Quarterly. 58 ( 4 ) . 255-269.
Holt. N. . Bremner. A. . Sutherland. E. . Vliek. M. L. W. . Passer. M. . and Smith. R. ( 2012 ) .
Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour ( 2nd ed. ) . Berkshire: McGraw-Hill
Hummert. M. L. ( 1990 ) . Multiple Stereotypes of Elderly and Young Adults: A Comparison of
Structure and Evaluation. Psychology and Aging. 5 ( 2 ) . 182-193. Jane Elliot and the Blue-Eyed Children Experiment ( n. d. ) . Retrieved November 9. 2014.
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. todayifoundout. com/index. php/2013/07/jane-elliot-and-the-blue-eyed-
Kane. M. N. ( 2004 ) . Ageism and Intervention: What Social Work Students Believe About
Treating Peoples Differently Because Of Age. Educational Gerontology. 30. 767-784. Mackie. M. ( 1973 ) . Arriving at “Truth” by Definition: The Case of Stereotype Inaccuracy.
Social Problems. 20 ( 4 ) . 431-447.
Martens. A. . Goldenberg. J. L. . and Greenberg. J. ( 2005 ) . A Terror Management
on Ageism. Journal of Social Issues. 61 ( 2 ) . 223-269.
Martens. A. . Greenberg. J. . Schimel. J. . and Landau. M. J. ( 2004 ) . Ageism and Death: Effectss
of Mortality Salience and Perceived Similarity to Elders and Reactions to Elderly
Peoples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 30 ( 12 ) . 1542-1536. Minichiello. V. . Browne. J. . and Kendig. H. ( 2000 ) . Percepts and effects of
agism: Positions of older people. Aging and Society. 20. 253-278. Myers. D. G. ( 2009 ) . Social Psychology ( 10th ed. ) . New York. New york: McGraw-Hill Higher
Nelson. T. D. ( 2004 ) . Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons. Cambridge.
Massachusetts. MA. London: The MIT Press.
Nelson. T. D. ( 2005 ) . Ageism: Bias Against Our Feared Future Self. Journal of Social
Issues. 61 ( 2 ) . 207-221.
Palmore. E. ( 2005 ) . Three Decades of Research on Ageism. Generations. 29 ( 3 ) . 87-90. Reyes-Ortiz. C. ( 1997 ) . Physicians Must Confront Ageism. Academic Medicine. 72 ( 10 ) .
Robb. C. . Chen. H. . and Haley. W. E. ( 2002 ) . Ageism in Mental Health and Health Care: Angstrom
Critical Review. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology. 8 ( 1 ) . 1-12. Rupp. D. E. . Vodanovich. S. J. . and Crede. M. ( 2006 ) . Age Bias in the Workplace: The Impact
of Ageism and Causal Attributions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 36 ( 6 ) .
Seale. C. ( 1996 ) . Populating Entirely towards the End of Life. Ageing and Society. 16 ( 1 ) .
Thompson. S. ( 2005 ) . Age Discrimination: Theory in Practice. Dorset: Russell House